Dominant Edaphic Controls on Particulate Organic Carbon in Global Soils

  • Ziyu Guo
  • , Jianzhao Liu
  • , Liyuan He
  • , Jorge L.Mazza Rodrigues
  • , Ning Chen
  • , Yunjiang Zuo
  • , Nannan Wang
  • , Xinhao Zhu
  • , Ying Sun
  • , Lihua Zhang
  • , Yanyu Song
  • , Dengjun Zhang
  • , Fenghui Yuan
  • , Changchun Song
  • , Xiaofeng Xu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The current soil carbon paradigm puts particulate organic carbon (POC) as one of the major components of soil organic carbon worldwide, highlighting its pivotal role in carbon mitigation. In this study, we compiled a global dataset of 3418 data points of POC concentration in soils and applied empirical modeling and machine learning algorithms to investigate the spatial variation in POC concentration and its controls. The global POC concentration in topsoil (0–30 cm) is estimated as 3.02 g C/kg dry soil, exhibiting a declining trend from polar regions to the equator. Boreal forests contain the highest POC concentration, averaging at 4.58 g C/kg dry soil, whereas savannas exhibit the lowest at 1.41 g C/kg dry soil. We developed a global map of soil POC density in soil profiles of 0-30 cm and 0–100 cm with an empirical model. The global stock of POC is 158.15 Pg C for 0–30 cm and 222.75 Pg C for 0–100 cm soil profiles with a substantial spatial variation. Analysis with a machine learning algorithm concluded the predominate controls of edaphic factors (i.e., bulk density and soil C content) on POC concentration across biomes. However, the secondary controls vary among biomes, with solid climate controls in grassland, pasture, and shrubland, while strong vegetation controls in forests. The biome-level estimates and maps of POC density provide a benchmark for modeling C fractions in soils; the various controls on POC suggest incorporating biological and physiochemical mechanisms in soil C models to assess and forecast the soil POC dynamics in response to global change.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere17619
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume30
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This study was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 42220104009; 42293263) of China, the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA28020502), the Young Scientists Innovation Funds of State Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization (2023HTDGZ‐QN‐03), Ecology Innovation Team (2020CXTD02) in Minzu University of China, and the Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. L.H., X.Z., and X.X. are grateful for the financial and facility support from San Diego State University and the U.S. National Science Foundation (2145130). JMR and XX acknowledged the support from a USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, The Agriculture and Food Research Initiative program. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (42220104009; 42293263); Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA28020502); U.S. National Science Foundation (2145130), and USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, The Agriculture and Food Research Initiative program. Funding:

Keywords

  • edaphic control
  • global budget
  • particulate organic carbon
  • vertical distribution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dominant Edaphic Controls on Particulate Organic Carbon in Global Soils'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this