Disturbance and diversity: Lichen species richness decreases with increasing anthropogenic disturbance

Laura M. Boggess, Christy M. McCain, Erin A. Manzitto-Tripp, Scott M. Pearson, James C. Lendemer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Anthropogenic disturbance is rapidly increasing through habitat degradation, development, and deforestation. Gaps remain in understanding the effects of this disturbance on diverse and ecologically important organisms such as lichens. In North America, studies have focused on epiphytic macrolichens and catastrophic disturbance, largely ignoring microlichens and less severe disturbances. The Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis predicts these moderate disturbances will lead to higher species richness. Here we examine the effects of anthropogenic disturbance in the form of land management on overall lichen richness, including microlichens, and on the species richness of eight lichen functional groups. The study draws on a comprehensive data set of 872 species, in 208 one-hectare plots throughout the Southern Appalachian Mountains, a global biodiversity hotspot in eastern North America. A habitat quality index based on an established forestry metric was used as a proxy for anthropogenic disturbance and was quantified using a 10-part score including categories such as percent native tree canopy cover and degree of fragmentation. Linear models were used to compare habitat quality scores to overall species richness and to species richness of functional groups. Rather than following the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis, all groups uniformly follow a negative linear relationship: as disturbance increases, species richness decreases. This pattern held even for widely variable functional groups such as morphotype. Effective conservation of lichen richness should prioritize the maintenance of existing older, less-disturbed stands within large, contiguously forested areas.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110598
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume293
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2024

Funding

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: James Lendemer reports financial support was provided by National Science Foundation. Christy McCain reports financial support was provided by National Science Foundation. Erin Manzitto-Tripp reports financial support was provided by National Science Foundation. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors thank Natalia Koch for her invaluable insight into selecting functional traits as indicators of ecological processes. Many colleagues and collaborators helped with field and GIS data collection including Jessica Allen, Carly Anderson Stewart, Malcolm Hodges, Jordan Hoffman, Jason Hollinger, Ben Nelson, Grant Vagle, and Matthew Wallace. The first author thanks Ana Carnaval, Phillip Staniczenko, Carol and Sam Boggess, and Josh Kelly for help clarifying and streamlining the manuscript and Howard Neufeld for insight and technical assistance with statistical analyses. The first author was supported by a doctoral studies research grant from the City University of New York. This research was made possible by a National Science Foundation Dimensions of Biodiversity Award to New York Botanical Garden (Award #1432629) and University of Colorado (Award #1542629).

FundersFunder number
National Science Foundation
City University of New York1432629
City University of New York
University of Colorado1542629
University of Colorado

    Keywords

    • Biodiversity
    • Forest management
    • Intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH)
    • Land-use change
    • Lichen community ecology
    • Old-growth forest

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Disturbance and diversity: Lichen species richness decreases with increasing anthropogenic disturbance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this