Discussion: Criticisms of the "correction factor" verification method [1]

Robert Wilson, Jun Shao, Fred Stern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

72 Scopus citations

Abstract

Seven criticisms of the correction factor verification method are discussed. The correction factor C k approach is equivalent to the GCI, but with a variable factor of safety (FS), which increases with distance of solutions from the asymptotic range. It is found that when solutions are between the intersection points, GCI approach is more conservative than C k approach. Variable FS that increases with distance from the asymptotic range is a common-sense advantage of correction factor approach compared to GCI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)704-706
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME
Volume126
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discussion: Criticisms of the "correction factor" verification method [1]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this