Discriminator Design Considerations for Time-Interval Measurement Circuits in Collider Detector Systems

  • Michael L. Simpson
  • , Michael J. Paulus

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    An analysis of timing jitter from leading-edge discriminators (LED's) and constant-fraction discriminators (CFD's) is presented. The jitter is calculated for the cases of random white noise, coherent noise (e.g., digital switching noise or ac power-line hum), and mixed (random and coherent) noise for both discriminator architectures. A general jitter equation valid for all of these conditions is derived. It is shown that the discriminator bandwidth for minimum jitter is strongly dependent on the amount of coherent noise. This effect is shown to be more pronounced for the LED. Even though off-line walk adjustments are possible for many timing measurements, the CFD is shown to provide a major advantage by acting as a correlated double sampler that removes much of the coherent noise expected in large, multichannel collider detector systems.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)98-104
    Number of pages7
    JournalIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
    Volume45
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1998

    Funding

    Manuscript received May 5, 1997; revised October 2, 1997. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy and performed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by Lockheed Martin Energy Research, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-84OR21400. The authors are with Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6006 USA. Publisher Item Identifier S 0018-9499(98)01216-7.

    Keywords

    • Collider detector systems
    • Constant fraction discriminator
    • Timing electronics
    • Timing jitter

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Discriminator Design Considerations for Time-Interval Measurement Circuits in Collider Detector Systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this