TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of Synthetic Rating Curves
T2 - Case Study in Iowa
AU - Quintero, Felipe
AU - Rojas, Marcela
AU - Muste, Marian
AU - Krajewski, Witold F.
AU - Perez, Gabriel
AU - Johnson, Shirley
AU - Anderson, Amanda
AU - Hunemuller, Toby
AU - Cappuccio, Bill
AU - Zogg, Jeffrey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - This case study describes an economically feasible approach to generate synthetic rating curves that enhance utility of stage-only river gauges. The study is based on a network of 250 bridge-mounted river-stage sensors (BMRSS) that the Iowa Flood Center has deployed in Iowa. The authors investigated using the step-backwater model with the Hydrologic Engineer Center's River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) to develop a stage-discharge relationship. The authors installed BMRSS at eight sites collocated with USGS gauging stations with well-established stage-discharge ratings to serve as reference. They also surveyed the channel cross sections in the upstream and downstream vicinity of the sensor locations. To account for uncertainty of channel roughness and free surface slope, they ran the model using a Monte Carlo simulation. The resulting rating curve realizations were compared with the USGS reference. The study reports the distribution of relative errors in the synthetic curve estimates, conditioned on the value of discharge. The results show average discharge errors of less than 5% for flows within the main channel banks and less than 3% in the floodplain. The average stage error is 0.43 m (range of 0.2-0.9 m). The authors also explored the error induced by using airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR)-based topographic surveys for the cross-sectional geometry. They assessed the model-based methodology at an additional 19 locations where USGS maintains rating curves and concluded that the results were inferior compared with those obtained using conventional geodetic surveys. The study provides a basis for expanded monitoring of streams and rivers with stage-only sensors.
AB - This case study describes an economically feasible approach to generate synthetic rating curves that enhance utility of stage-only river gauges. The study is based on a network of 250 bridge-mounted river-stage sensors (BMRSS) that the Iowa Flood Center has deployed in Iowa. The authors investigated using the step-backwater model with the Hydrologic Engineer Center's River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) to develop a stage-discharge relationship. The authors installed BMRSS at eight sites collocated with USGS gauging stations with well-established stage-discharge ratings to serve as reference. They also surveyed the channel cross sections in the upstream and downstream vicinity of the sensor locations. To account for uncertainty of channel roughness and free surface slope, they ran the model using a Monte Carlo simulation. The resulting rating curve realizations were compared with the USGS reference. The study reports the distribution of relative errors in the synthetic curve estimates, conditioned on the value of discharge. The results show average discharge errors of less than 5% for flows within the main channel banks and less than 3% in the floodplain. The average stage error is 0.43 m (range of 0.2-0.9 m). The authors also explored the error induced by using airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR)-based topographic surveys for the cross-sectional geometry. They assessed the model-based methodology at an additional 19 locations where USGS maintains rating curves and concluded that the results were inferior compared with those obtained using conventional geodetic surveys. The study provides a basis for expanded monitoring of streams and rivers with stage-only sensors.
KW - Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) topography
KW - Hydrologic Engineer Center's River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) model
KW - Stage-discharge relationship
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095436526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002022
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85095436526
SN - 1084-0699
VL - 26
JO - Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
JF - Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
IS - 1
M1 - 2022
ER -