TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and validation of innovative hot water spray defrosting method
AU - Bahar, Elif Merve
AU - Aktaş, Mustafa
AU - Aktekeli, Burak
AU - Şevik, Seyfi
AU - Güven, Yaren
AU - Aktaş, Ahmet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - One of the most common problems in refrigeration cycles is the failure to defrost the evaporator, resulting in decreased performance. This study proposes the hot water defrosting approach as an alternative to the defrosting process using hot gas, an electric heater, and airflow. For this purpose, a hot water box was designed to use the heat from the compressor discharge line, which contains finned tubes through which R290 (propane) refrigerant flows for defrosting. In addition, a defrost control method algorithm was established. The best coefficient of performance (COP) of 4.34 was obtained in Exp. 3. The highest defrosting efficiency was 58.79 % for the hot water defrosting method, while the lowest value was 28.29 % for the airflow. It was observed that the defrosting time could be shortened by using the hot water method, better energy usage could be achieved by using Exp. 4, and a more effective defrosting efficiency could be achieved by using Exp. 5. It was determined that the hot water method can create a difference of up to 44 % in defrost efficiency compared to the hot gas method. Moreover, it was determined that the new approach has almost the same performance compared to the reverse cycle method, but it can provide an advantage because it is not exposed to sudden pressure fluctuations and mechanical shocks. Despite the modest return on investment (0.56–2.22 years) and sustainability for as long as the system is in use, the risk of corrosion that may occur over time during the hot water spraying process should be considered.
AB - One of the most common problems in refrigeration cycles is the failure to defrost the evaporator, resulting in decreased performance. This study proposes the hot water defrosting approach as an alternative to the defrosting process using hot gas, an electric heater, and airflow. For this purpose, a hot water box was designed to use the heat from the compressor discharge line, which contains finned tubes through which R290 (propane) refrigerant flows for defrosting. In addition, a defrost control method algorithm was established. The best coefficient of performance (COP) of 4.34 was obtained in Exp. 3. The highest defrosting efficiency was 58.79 % for the hot water defrosting method, while the lowest value was 28.29 % for the airflow. It was observed that the defrosting time could be shortened by using the hot water method, better energy usage could be achieved by using Exp. 4, and a more effective defrosting efficiency could be achieved by using Exp. 5. It was determined that the hot water method can create a difference of up to 44 % in defrost efficiency compared to the hot gas method. Moreover, it was determined that the new approach has almost the same performance compared to the reverse cycle method, but it can provide an advantage because it is not exposed to sudden pressure fluctuations and mechanical shocks. Despite the modest return on investment (0.56–2.22 years) and sustainability for as long as the system is in use, the risk of corrosion that may occur over time during the hot water spraying process should be considered.
KW - Control algorithm
KW - Defrost
KW - Defrost efficiency
KW - Energy efficiency
KW - Refrigeration
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105005074059
U2 - 10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103668
DO - 10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103668
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105005074059
SN - 2451-9049
VL - 62
JO - Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
JF - Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
M1 - 103668
ER -