Abstract
Experimental science is enabled by the combination of synthesis, imaging, and functional characterization organized into evolving discovery loop. Synthesis of new material is typically followed by a set of characterization steps aiming to provide feedback for optimization or discover fundamental mechanisms. However, the sequence of synthesis and characterization methods and their interpretation, or research workflow, has traditionally been driven by human intuition and is highly domain specific. Here, we explore concepts of scientific workflows that emerge at the interface between theory, characterization, and imaging. We discuss the criteria by which these workflows can be constructed for special cases of multiresolution structural imaging and functional characterization, as a part of more general material synthesis workflows. Some considerations for theory-experiment workflows are provided. We further pose that the emergence of user facilities and cloud labs disrupts the classical progression from ideation, orchestration, and execution stages of workflow development. To accelerate this transition, we propose the framework for workflow design, including universal hyperlanguages describing laboratory operation, ontological domain matching, reward functions and their integration between domains, and policy development for workflow optimization. These tools will enable knowledge-based workflow optimization; enable lateral instrumental networks, sequential and parallel orchestration of characterization between dissimilar facilities; and empower distributed research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 011314 |
Journal | Applied Physics Reviews |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1 2024 |
Funding
This effort was supported by the center for 3D Ferroelectric Microelectronics (3DFeM), an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences under Award No. DE-SC0021118. This research (sections on mathematics of workflow optimization) was supported by the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences (CNMS), which is a U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science User Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. M.A. acknowledges support from National Science Foundation (NSF), Award No. 2043205 and Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Award No. FG-2022-18275. The authors acknowledge Peter Loxley, Tonio Buonassisi, Benji Maruyama, John Gregoire, Helge Stein, and Stephen R. Niezgoda for fruitful discussion. We also gratefully acknowledge the exceptionally useful suggestions by the reviewers that significantly contributed to the discussion.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences | |
center for 3D Ferroelectric Microelectronics | |
National Science Foundation | 2043205 |
U.S. Department of Energy | |
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation | FG-2022-18275 |
Office of Science | |
Basic Energy Sciences | DE-SC0021118 |
Oak Ridge National Laboratory |