Abstract
Despite numerous studies in recent times, there is no consensus on the primary drivers for groundwater storage (GWS) changes over India. Thus, predicting future groundwater level trends seems remote. In this context, using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE)-derived GWS, WaterGap model-based groundwater recharge (GWR), and groundwater withdrawal (GWW), we show that GWW exhibits a stronger dominance than GWR on GWS change over India. Furthermore, we developed feed-forward neural network (FNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), and deep learning-based long short-term memory network (LSTM) models using multidepth in situ observations from a dense network of monitoring wells (n = 5367, 1996−2018), to simulate and forecast groundwater levels (GWL) in India. The result demonstrates the better performance of LSTM (>84% of observation wells showing r > 0.6, RMSEn < 0.7) across India, outperforming both FNN and RNN in the testing period of 5 years (2014−2018). Our estimates also reveal that besides the prevailing long-term (1996−2018) statistically significant (p < 0.1) declining GWL trends in northwest India and the Ganges river basin, higher declining trends will potentially be observed in parts of north-central and south India in the forecasting period of 5 years (2019−2023). We envisage that the forecasting approach presented in the study can contribute toward an improved urban−rural drinking water supply and sustainable crop production for 1.3 billion people in India.(Figure
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 965-977 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | ACS ES and T Engineering |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 11 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
Financial support for this work was provided by the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India (project no: IIT/SRIC/GG & CSE/AGI/2013-14/201) and Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (project no: DST/TMD-EWO/WTI/2K19/EWFH/2019/ 201 (G) & (C) Dated: 28.10.2020). Notes The authors declare no competing financial interest. We acknowledge the freely available data from Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Government of India; Climatic Research Unit, GRACE, Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS), and WaterGAP. Groundwater level data are retrieved from the CGWB’s repositories, which could be accessed here: http://cgwb.gov.in/GW-data-access.html. Precipitation data were available from the archives of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU TS v-4.01) at https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/ cru/data/hg/. GRACE terrestrial water storage data were obtained from NASA JPL’s archive: http://grace.jpl.nasa.gov. The GLDAS data are obtained from GLDAS simulations that are archived and distributed by the Goddard Earth Sciences (GES) Data and Information Services Center (DISC) and can be accessed at https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets?keywords= evapotranspiration&sort=-timeRes&page=1&source= Models%2FAnalyses%20OBSERVATION%20BASED. Groundwater withdrawals and groundwater recharge data are taken from the WaterGAP (version 2.2b) simulation, available from Goethe University Frankfurt’s archive (https://www.uni-frankfurt.de/45217892/Datens%C3%A4tze___Data_sets).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India | DST/TMD-EWO/WTI/2K19/EWFH/2019/ 201, 28.10.2020 |
Ministry of Education, India | CSE/AGI/2013-14/201 |
Keywords
- Groundwater quantity
- India
- LSTM-based forecasting
- Relative driver importance on groundwater storage
- water−food−energy nexus