TY - JOUR
T1 - Cycle-to-cycle feedback for combustion control of spark advance at the misfire limit
AU - Maldonado, Bryan P.
AU - Stefanopoulou, Anna G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 by ASME.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - At a given speed and load, the spark advance (SA) is tuned to reach the maximum brake torque (MBT) timing to maximize efficiency. The use of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) can further improve fuel economy (FE) at the same speed and load. As EGR increases, MBT moves toward a more advanced timing that can be limited by the high variability in the combustion process, reflected in unacceptable torque fluctuations. This variability is rapidly increased by the random occurrence of partial burns and/or misfires. In order to operate close to the misfire limit, a stochastic misfire controller has been designed to momentarily move from an undesired to an allowable misfire rate, without significantly increasing variability in the combustion process. Control-oriented models for the combustion process and misfire events are discussed. Simulation of the closed-loop system shows that the feedback misfire controller, on average, stays closer to the misfire limit than a more conventional controller designed to react when a misfire is detected.
AB - At a given speed and load, the spark advance (SA) is tuned to reach the maximum brake torque (MBT) timing to maximize efficiency. The use of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) can further improve fuel economy (FE) at the same speed and load. As EGR increases, MBT moves toward a more advanced timing that can be limited by the high variability in the combustion process, reflected in unacceptable torque fluctuations. This variability is rapidly increased by the random occurrence of partial burns and/or misfires. In order to operate close to the misfire limit, a stochastic misfire controller has been designed to momentarily move from an undesired to an allowable misfire rate, without significantly increasing variability in the combustion process. Control-oriented models for the combustion process and misfire events are discussed. Simulation of the closed-loop system shows that the feedback misfire controller, on average, stays closer to the misfire limit than a more conventional controller designed to react when a misfire is detected.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051362303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/1.4039728
DO - 10.1115/1.4039728
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85051362303
SN - 0742-4795
VL - 140
JO - Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
JF - Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
IS - 10
M1 - 102812
ER -