Criticality Accident Alarm System Shielding Benchmark: Integral Experiment Request 498, Critical Engineering Decision 2 Report

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Abstract

A workable design to perform a CAAS benchmark experiment is detailed herein. Key dimensions, materials, source intensity levels, and detectors are listed in this report. Sensitivity to 21 perturbations was determined to be acceptable. The next step will be for NCSP management to determine whether procurement should occur and if the experiment should proceed. The perturbation study suggests that the room return shield cavity radius and runout should be maintained to within a millimeter, the room return shield should be positioned carefully (perhaps with a laser range finder), and that the detectors should be mounted in a lightweight fixture such as aluminum, so their positioning is assured. Using a 3D scanner or photogrammetry to record part shapes may be beneficial. Further work is also needed to verify source reproducibility.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationUnited States
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • 61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY
  • 46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
  • 36 MATERIALS SCIENCE
  • Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP)
  • Integral Experiments
  • Godiva IV Critical Assembly
  • Criticality Accident Alarm System (CAAS)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Criticality Accident Alarm System Shielding Benchmark: Integral Experiment Request 498, Critical Engineering Decision 2 Report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this