Corrigendum: 〈 U.S. lithium resources from geothermal and extraction feasibility〉 (Resources, Conservation & Recycling (2021) 169, (S092134492100121X), (10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105514))

Ange Lionel Toba, Ruby Nguyen, Carson Cole, Ghanashyam Neupane, Mariappan Parans Paranthaman

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

< Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Volume 169, June 2021, 105,514.> The authors regret <the errors made in their article and would like to kindly request correction. Here are the corrections needed: In the abstract, it says: "Results show that Li supply from geothermal brine could (1) reach around 4% – 8% of total US Li supply and (2) be economically viable". It should be: "Results show that Li supply from geothermal brine could (1) reach around 4% – 8% of global Li supply and (2) be economically viable" In section 3, subsection 3.1, it says: "All 20 plants summed together could produce a total of 10,000 mt LCE/year at the minimum, and up to 284,000 mt LCE/year, which show a good potential resource for extraction." It should be: "All 20 plants summed together could produce a total of 55,913 mt LCE/year at the minimum, and up to 1513,260 mt LCE/year, which show a good potential resource for extraction." The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. DOI of original article: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105514> <Corresponding author details: Ange-Lionel Toba> <Corresponding author email address: [email protected]>

Original languageEnglish
Article number106119
JournalResources, Conservation and Recycling
Volume179
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum: 〈 U.S. lithium resources from geothermal and extraction feasibility〉 (Resources, Conservation & Recycling (2021) 169, (S092134492100121X), (10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105514))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this