Abstract
The authors regret that there were errors in Figs. 3 and 4, which in turn meant there were errors in Table 2. In Figs. 3 and 4, the lattice strain ((d-d0)/d0, where d is the lattice spacing) as a function of strain/stress should have plotted. Please find below the corrected versions of the figures and table. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Fig. 3. The evolution of elastic lattice strains along the axial and radial directions in grain families having {111}, {200}, {220}, {311} and {222} crystallographic planes during tensile loading at (a) 77 K and (b) 293 K.[Figure presented] Fig. 4. The (111) first order and (222) second order reflections together with the stacking fault probability as a function of true strain at (a) 77 K, (b) 293 K. [Figure presented] Table 2. Uniaxial materials properties of FeCoCrNi HEA at 77 and 293 K.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 240-242 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Acta Materialia |
| Volume | 163 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Jan 15 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to ‘Probing deformation mechanisms of a FeCoCrNi high-entropy alloy at 293 and 77 K using in situ neutron diffraction’ [Acta Mater. 154C (2018) 79–89](S1359645418303653)(10.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.013)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver