Abstract
The authors regret an error in our Methodology section. Rather than a block of dimensions 100 × 40 × 40 mm, the characterized material was taken from a build volume with dimensions of 30 × 50 × 40 mm. Rather than a beam-on time of 0.25 ms and a spot spacing of 0.1 mm, this build employed a beam-on time of 0.10 ms and a spot spacing of 0.2 mm. As this work was focused solely on the characterization of the material, and not the influence of specific process parameters, these discrepancies have no bearing on any of the results or analysis in this manuscript, nor any of the discussion or conclusions drawn from this work. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 111069 |
Journal | Materials Characterization |
Volume | 176 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Jun 2021 |