Corrigendum to “Beyond the classical kinetic model for chronic graphite oxidation by moisture in high temperature gas-cooled reactors” [Carbon 127 (February 2018) 158–169](S0008622317311028)(10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.001))

Cristian I. Contescu; Robert W. Mee; Yoonjo (Jo Jo) Lee; Jose D. Arregui-Mena; Nidia C. Gallego; Timothy D. Burchell; Joshua J. Kane; William E. Windes

doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.040

Corrigendum to “Beyond the classical kinetic model for chronic graphite oxidation by moisture in high temperature gas-cooled reactors” [Carbon 127 (February 2018) 158–169](S0008622317311028)(10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.001))

Cristian I. Contescu, Robert W. Mee, Yoonjo (Jo Jo) Lee, Jose D. Arregui-Mena, Nidia C. Gallego, Timothy D. Burchell, Joshua J. Kane, William E. Windes

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authors learned that Tables 3 and 4 of the published paper do not contain all information that would allow the readers to reproduce the fitting trends shown in Figures 6 and 8. Please use corrected tables, shown below. They differ from the published version only in their last line, which now provide analytical expressions for m(T). This parameter is defined in eq. (6) of the published paper. [Table presented] [Table presented] The oxidation rates of each graphite grade at particular values of T, P_H2O and P_H2 can be calculated by plugging the parametrized expressions for k₁, k₂, k_3, and m(T) from corrected Tables 3 and 4 in the rate equation (8’), shown below. [Formula presented] This simpler rate equation should be used in lieu of eq. (8) from the published paper. The authors apologize to readers for these errors.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	249
Number of pages	1
Journal	Carbon
Volume	140
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.040
State	Published - Dec 2018

Access to Document

10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.040

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Beyond the classical kinetic model for chronic graphite oxidation by moisture in high temperature gas-cooled reactors” [Carbon 127 (February 2018) 158–169](S0008622317311028)(10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.001))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Contescu, C. I., Mee, R. W., Lee, Y., Arregui-Mena, J. D., Gallego, N. C., Burchell, T. D., Kane, J. J., & Windes, W. E. (2018). Corrigendum to “Beyond the classical kinetic model for chronic graphite oxidation by moisture in high temperature gas-cooled reactors” [Carbon 127 (February 2018) 158–169](S0008622317311028)(10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.001)). Carbon, 140, 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.040

@article{3bdcd929c53f49b6ab59a5c2810f5017,

title = "Corrigendum to “Beyond the classical kinetic model for chronic graphite oxidation by moisture in high temperature gas-cooled reactors” [Carbon 127 (February 2018) 158–169](S0008622317311028)(10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.001))",

abstract = "The authors learned that Tables 3 and 4 of the published paper do not contain all information that would allow the readers to reproduce the fitting trends shown in Figures 6 and 8. Please use corrected tables, shown below. They differ from the published version only in their last line, which now provide analytical expressions for m(T). This parameter is defined in eq. (6) of the published paper. [Table presented] [Table presented] The oxidation rates of each graphite grade at particular values of T, PH2O and PH2 can be calculated by plugging the parametrized expressions for k1, k2, k3, and m(T) from corrected Tables 3 and 4 in the rate equation (8{\textquoteright}), shown below. [Formula presented] This simpler rate equation should be used in lieu of eq. (8) from the published paper. The authors apologize to readers for these errors.",

author = "Contescu, {Cristian I.} and Mee, {Robert W.} and Lee, {Yoonjo (Jo Jo)} and Arregui-Mena, {Jose D.} and Gallego, {Nidia C.} and Burchell, {Timothy D.} and Kane, {Joshua J.} and Windes, {William E.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2018",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.040",

language = "English",

volume = "140",

pages = "249",

journal = "Carbon",

issn = "0008-6223",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Contescu, CI, Mee, RW, Lee, Y, Arregui-Mena, JD , Gallego, NC, Burchell, TD, Kane, JJ & Windes, WE 2018, 'Corrigendum to “Beyond the classical kinetic model for chronic graphite oxidation by moisture in high temperature gas-cooled reactors” [Carbon 127 (February 2018) 158–169](S0008622317311028)(10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.001))', Carbon, vol. 140, pp. 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.040

Corrigendum to “Beyond the classical kinetic model for chronic graphite oxidation by moisture in high temperature gas-cooled reactors” [Carbon 127 (February 2018) 158–169](S0008622317311028)(10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.001)). / Contescu, Cristian I.; Mee, Robert W.; Lee, Yoonjo (Jo Jo) et al.
In: Carbon, Vol. 140, 12.2018, p. 249.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to “Beyond the classical kinetic model for chronic graphite oxidation by moisture in high temperature gas-cooled reactors” [Carbon 127 (February 2018) 158–169](S0008622317311028)(10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.001))

AU - Contescu, Cristian I.

AU - Mee, Robert W.

AU - Lee, Yoonjo (Jo Jo)

AU - Arregui-Mena, Jose D.

AU - Gallego, Nidia C.

AU - Burchell, Timothy D.

AU - Kane, Joshua J.

AU - Windes, William E.

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - The authors learned that Tables 3 and 4 of the published paper do not contain all information that would allow the readers to reproduce the fitting trends shown in Figures 6 and 8. Please use corrected tables, shown below. They differ from the published version only in their last line, which now provide analytical expressions for m(T). This parameter is defined in eq. (6) of the published paper. [Table presented] [Table presented] The oxidation rates of each graphite grade at particular values of T, PH2O and PH2 can be calculated by plugging the parametrized expressions for k1, k2, k3, and m(T) from corrected Tables 3 and 4 in the rate equation (8’), shown below. [Formula presented] This simpler rate equation should be used in lieu of eq. (8) from the published paper. The authors apologize to readers for these errors.

AB - The authors learned that Tables 3 and 4 of the published paper do not contain all information that would allow the readers to reproduce the fitting trends shown in Figures 6 and 8. Please use corrected tables, shown below. They differ from the published version only in their last line, which now provide analytical expressions for m(T). This parameter is defined in eq. (6) of the published paper. [Table presented] [Table presented] The oxidation rates of each graphite grade at particular values of T, PH2O and PH2 can be calculated by plugging the parametrized expressions for k1, k2, k3, and m(T) from corrected Tables 3 and 4 in the rate equation (8’), shown below. [Formula presented] This simpler rate equation should be used in lieu of eq. (8) from the published paper. The authors apologize to readers for these errors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052941194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.040

DO - 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.040

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85052941194

SN - 0008-6223

VL - 140

SP - 249

JO - Carbon

JF - Carbon

ER -

Corrigendum to “Beyond the classical kinetic model for chronic graphite oxidation by moisture in high temperature gas-cooled reactors” [Carbon 127 (February 2018) 158–169](S0008622317311028)(10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.001))

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this