Corrigendum to “Application of alloy solidification theory to cellular automata modeling of near-rapid constrained solidification” [Comput. Mater. Sci. 163 (2019) 148–161] (Computational Materials Science (2019) 163 (148–161), (S0927025619301417), (10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.03.012))

We regret to inform readers of our article that the interfacial response functions, fit using parameters from Tables 1 and 7 and shown in Figs. 4, 6, and 9, were fitted incorrectly. The differences in interfacial response function shape were minimal, and the shift in predicted steady-state undercooling for the systems simulated were around a few Kelvin at most. While conclusions drawn and points made throughout the paper remain valid, results from Sections 4.1 and 4.4 should be taken as valid for generic binary beta-Ti alloy systems (rather than correlated to specific compositions) due to the erroneous interfacial response functions used. Results of Sections 4.2 and 4.3 were recalculated using the proper interfacial responses, using a mean nucleation undercooling of 7.5 K rather than 5 K to compensate for the shift in interfacial response. Corrected Tables 4–6 and Figs. 4–6 show different values, but display the same trends that support the main points of the paper. The changes are the compositions and supercooling parameter P values in Fig. 6 and Table 6, though the interfacial response function shape differences between alloys still yielded the expected results. We apologize for any inconvenience caused by this update.