Corrigendum: MHD stability of JT-60SA operation scenarios driven by passing energetic particles for a hot Maxwellian model (Nucl. Fusion(2020)60(096009) Doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab9dd1)

J. Varela; K. Y. Watanabe; K. Shinohara; M. Honda; Y. Suzuki; J. Shiraishi; D. A. Spong; L. Garcia

doi:10.1088/1741-4326/abc731

Corrigendum: MHD stability of JT-60SA operation scenarios driven by passing energetic particles for a hot Maxwellian model (Nucl. Fusion(2020)60(096009) Doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab9dd1)

J. Varela, K. Y. Watanabe, K. Shinohara, M. Honda, Y. Suzuki, J. Shiraishi, D. A. Spong, L. Garcia

Plasma Theory and Modeling

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Abstract

There is an error in the EP values included in the summary table 3 of section Conclusions and discussion . Table 3 indicates the EP threshold to destabilize different n = 1 to four AEs families (BAE, TAE and EAE) in the ITER-like inductive scenario and the off-axis case. The values of the EP are wrongly multiplied by a factor 10. Now, the EP values are correct and are shown in%. Thatway, table 3 is consistent with the data shown in figures 9 and 12.

Original language	English
Article number	019501
Journal	Nuclear Fusion
Volume	61
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/abc731
State	Published - Jan 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1088/1741-4326/abc731

Cite this

Varela, J., Watanabe, K. Y., Shinohara, K., Honda, M., Suzuki, Y., Shiraishi, J., Spong, D. A., & Garcia, L. (2021). Corrigendum: MHD stability of JT-60SA operation scenarios driven by passing energetic particles for a hot Maxwellian model (Nucl. Fusion(2020)60(096009) Doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab9dd1). Nuclear Fusion, 61(1), Article 019501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/abc731

@article{c910ca7fdac6435ba13400b117acaf2d,

title = "Corrigendum: MHD stability of JT-60SA operation scenarios driven by passing energetic particles for a hot Maxwellian model (Nucl. Fusion(2020)60(096009) Doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab9dd1)",

abstract = "There is an error in the EP values included in the summary table 3 of section Conclusions and discussion . Table 3 indicates the EP threshold to destabilize different n = 1 to four AEs families (BAE, TAE and EAE) in the ITER-like inductive scenario and the off-axis case. The values of the EP are wrongly multiplied by a factor 10. Now, the EP values are correct and are shown in%. Thatway, table 3 is consistent with the data shown in figures 9 and 12.",

author = "J. Varela and Watanabe, {K. Y.} and K. Shinohara and M. Honda and Y. Suzuki and J. Shiraishi and Spong, {D. A.} and L. Garcia",

year = "2021",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1088/1741-4326/abc731",

language = "English",

volume = "61",

journal = "Nuclear Fusion",

issn = "0029-5515",

publisher = "IOP Publishing",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum

T2 - MHD stability of JT-60SA operation scenarios driven by passing energetic particles for a hot Maxwellian model (Nucl. Fusion(2020)60(096009) Doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab9dd1)

AU - Varela, J.

AU - Watanabe, K. Y.

AU - Shinohara, K.

AU - Honda, M.

AU - Suzuki, Y.

AU - Shiraishi, J.

AU - Spong, D. A.

AU - Garcia, L.

PY - 2021/1

Y1 - 2021/1

N2 - There is an error in the EP values included in the summary table 3 of section Conclusions and discussion . Table 3 indicates the EP threshold to destabilize different n = 1 to four AEs families (BAE, TAE and EAE) in the ITER-like inductive scenario and the off-axis case. The values of the EP are wrongly multiplied by a factor 10. Now, the EP values are correct and are shown in%. Thatway, table 3 is consistent with the data shown in figures 9 and 12.

AB - There is an error in the EP values included in the summary table 3 of section Conclusions and discussion . Table 3 indicates the EP threshold to destabilize different n = 1 to four AEs families (BAE, TAE and EAE) in the ITER-like inductive scenario and the off-axis case. The values of the EP are wrongly multiplied by a factor 10. Now, the EP values are correct and are shown in%. Thatway, table 3 is consistent with the data shown in figures 9 and 12.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098273649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1741-4326/abc731

DO - 10.1088/1741-4326/abc731

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85098273649

SN - 0029-5515

VL - 61

JO - Nuclear Fusion

JF - Nuclear Fusion

IS - 1

M1 - 019501

ER -

Corrigendum: MHD stability of JT-60SA operation scenarios driven by passing energetic particles for a hot Maxwellian model (Nucl. Fusion(2020)60(096009) Doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab9dd1)

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this