Correlating in-situ sensor data to defect locations and part quality for additively manufactured parts using machine learning

Zackary Snow, Edward W. Reutzel, Jan Petrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this work, process monitoring data, including layerwise imagery, multi-spectral emissions, and laser scan vector data, were collected during laser-based powder bed fusion additive manufacturing and correlated to fatigue performance. All parts were X-ray CT scanned post-build, and internal flaws were identified via an automated defect recognition software. Convolutional neural networks were trained to discriminate flaws from nominal build conditions using in situ data modalities only. Trained classifiers were then tested against a previously unseen data set collected from an independent build, and classification performance and metrics for information content provided by each individual modality were formally established. Correlations were drawn between the detected flaw populations and the corresponding fatigue properties, demonstrating that fatigue critical lack-of-fusion flaws can be detected via machine learning of in situ sensor data. The present results also show that, at least from a classification accuracy perspective, flaw detection via ML on process monitoring data is a viable path forward for real-time flaw detection and automated, interlayer repair strategies. However, strategies for extracting and analyzing sensor data in real-time without incurring excessive increases in build time must first be developed. These developments represent necessary components to draw direct correlations between in situ data modalities, internal part quality, and fatigue performance.

Original languageEnglish
Article number117476
JournalJournal of Materials Processing Technology
Volume302
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2022
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This work utilizes experimental data generated under an prior effort supported by the National Center for Defense Manufacturing and Machining under the America Makes Program #3013 entitled “Understanding Stochastic Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Flaw Formation and Impact on Fatigue” sponsored by Air Force Research Laboratory under agreement number FA8650-16-2-5700. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. This work utilizes experimental data generated under an prior effort supported by the National Center for Defense Manufacturing and Machining under the America Makes Program #3013 entitled ?Understanding Stochastic Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Flaw Formation and Impact on Fatigue? sponsored by Air Force Research Laboratory under agreement number FA8650-16-2-5700. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. The authors would like to thank Dr. Abdalla Nassar, Dr. David Corbin and Mr. Griffin Jones from PSU/ARL and Dr. Jared Blecher and Mr. Ryan Overdorff from 3D Systems, Inc. for support in designing and executing the experiments, in data acquisition, and in providing CT scanning expertise and data.

FundersFunder number
3D Systems, Inc.
National Center for Defense Manufacturing and Machining
Air Force Research LaboratoryFA8650-16-2-5700
Army Research Laboratory
Pennsylvania State University

    Keywords

    • Additive manufacturing
    • Machine learning
    • Process monitoring
    • Qualification

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Correlating in-situ sensor data to defect locations and part quality for additively manufactured parts using machine learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this