Abstract
Hydrophobic voids within titanium silicates have long been considered necessary to achieve high rates and selectivities for alkene epoxidations with H2O2. The catalytic consequences of silanol groups and their stabilization of hydrogen-bonded networks of water (H2O), however, have not been demonstrated in ways that lead to a clear understanding of their importance. We compare turnover rates for 1-octene epoxidation and H2O2 decomposition over a series of Ti-substituted zeoliteBEA (Ti-BEA) that encompasses a wide range of densities of silanol nests ((SiOH)4). The most hydrophilic Ti-BEA gives epoxidation turnover rates that are 100 times larger than those in defect-free Ti-BEA, yet rates of H2O2 decomposition are similar for all (SiOH)4 densities. These differences cause the most hydrophilic Ti-BEA to also give the highest selectivities, which defies conventional wisdom. Spectroscopic, thermodynamic, and kinetic evidence indicate that these catalytic differences are not due to changes in the electronic affinity of the active site, the electronic structure of Ti-OOH intermediates, or the mechanism for epoxidation. Comparisons of apparent activation enthalpies and entropies show that differences in epoxidation rates and selectivities reflect favorable entropy gains produced when epoxidation transition states disrupt hydrogen-bonded H2O clusters anchored to (SiOH)4 near active sites. Transition states for H2O2 decomposition hydrogen bond with H2O in ways similar to Ti-OOH reactive species, such that decomposition becomes insensitive to the presence of (SiOH)4. Collectively, these findings clarify how molecular interactions between reactive species, hydrogen-bonded solvent networks, and polar surfaces can influence rates and selectivities for epoxidation (and other reactions) in zeolite catalysts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 7302-7319 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of the American Chemical Society |
Volume | 141 |
Issue number | 18 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 16 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
We thank Ms. Megan Witzke for helpful comments and discussion and Mrs. Giselle Bukowski for her graphical assistance. D.T.B. was supported by the Department of Defense (DoD) through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship (NDSEG) Program. B.C.B. and J.G. acknowledge support from the NSF DMREF program (CBET-1437219). M.J.C. and R.G. acknowledge support from the Purdue Process Safety and Assurance Center (P2SAC). This work was carried out, in part, in the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory Central Research Facilities and the School of Chemical Sciences NMR Lab at the University of Illinois. This work was supported by the U.S. Army Research Office under grant number W911NF-18-1-0100, with partial support from a research grant from the National Science Foundation (CBET-15531377).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory Central Research Facilities | |
NSF DMREF | CBET-1437219 |
Purdue Process Safety and Assurance Center | P2SAC |
School of Chemical Sciences NMR Lab | |
U.S. Army Research Office | |
National Science Foundation | CBET-15531377 |
U.S. Department of Defense | DoD |
National Sleep Foundation | |
U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory | W911NF-18-1-0100 |
University of Illinois | |
National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate |