Controlling cellular reactive responses around neural prosthetic devices using peripheral and local intervention strategies

William Shain, Leah Spataro, Jonathan Dilgen, Kraig Haverstick, Scott Retterer, Michael Isaacson, Mark Saltzman, James N. Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

203 Scopus citations

Abstract

While chronic use of indwelling micromachined neural prosthetic devices has great potential, the development of reactive responses around them results in a decrease in electrode function over time. Since the cellular events responsible for these responses may be anti-inflammatory in nature, we have tested the effectiveness of dexamethasone and cyclosporin A as potential drugs for developing intervention strategies following insertion of single-shank micromachined silicon devices. Peripheral injection of dexamethasone was effective in attenuating increased expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and astrocyte hyperplasia observed during both initial- and sustained-reactive responses observed at one and six weeks post insertion, respectively. Peripheral injection of cyclosporin A had no positive effect. If anything, application of this drug increased the early reactive response. Effectiveness of local release of dexamethasone in rat neocortex was tested by inserting ribbons of poly (ethyl-vinyl) acetate containing 35% (w/w) dexamethasone. Initial concentrations of dexamethasone were similar to those obtained by peripheral injection. Local drug release provided continued control of cellular reactive responses during the six-week study period. These results demonstrate that peripheral delivery of dexamethasone can be used to control reactive responses and that local drug delivery by slow-release from biocompatible polymers may be a more effective method of drug intervention. Incorporating these strategies on micromachined devices may provide an intervention strategy that will insure the chronic functioning of electrodes on intracortical neuroprosthetic devices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-188
Number of pages3
JournalIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2003
Externally publishedYes

Funding

Manuscript received February 30, 2003; revised May 2, 2003. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health and by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering under Grant EB-000359. W. Shain and J. N. Turner are with the Wadsworth Center, Albany NY 12201-0509 USA, and also with the Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12201-0509 USA (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]). L. Spataro is with the Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). J. Dilgen is with Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208 USA. K. Haverstick is with the Department of Chemical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA. S. Retterer is with the School of Applied Engineering and Physics, Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). M. Isaacson is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). M. Saltzman is with the Department of Chemical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814800 Fig. 1. Scanning electron micrograph of a model silicon-fabricated neural prosthetic device. The shank is 2-mm long, 100-m wide, and 100-m thick. The tab is a cube and measures 500 m on a side.

Keywords

  • Biocompatible polymers
  • Cyclosporin
  • Dexamethasone
  • Drug delivery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Controlling cellular reactive responses around neural prosthetic devices using peripheral and local intervention strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this