Continent-wide tree fecundity driven by indirect climate effects

James S. Clark, Robert Andrus, Melaine Aubry-Kientz, Yves Bergeron, Michal Bogdziewicz, Don C. Bragg, Dale Brockway, Natalie L. Cleavitt, Susan Cohen, Benoit Courbaud, Robert Daley, Adrian J. Das, Michael Dietze, Timothy J. Fahey, Istem Fer, Jerry F. Franklin, Catherine A. Gehring, Gregory S. Gilbert, Cathryn H. Greenberg, Qinfeng GuoJanneke HilleRisLambers, Ines Ibanez, Jill Johnstone, Christopher L. Kilner, Johannes Knops, Walter D. Koenig, Georges Kunstler, Jalene M. LaMontagne, Kristin L. Legg, Jordan Luongo, James A. Lutz, Diana Macias, Eliot J.B. McIntire, Yassine Messaoud, Christopher M. Moore, Emily Moran, Jonathan A. Myers, Orrin B. Myers, Chase Nunez, Robert Parmenter, Sam Pearse, Scott Pearson, Renata Poulton-Kamakura, Ethan Ready, Miranda D. Redmond, Chantal D. Reid, Kyle C. Rodman, C. Lane Scher, William H. Schlesinger, Amanda M. Schwantes, Erin Shanahan, Shubhi Sharma, Michael A. Steele, Nathan L. Stephenson, Samantha Sutton, Jennifer J. Swenson, Margaret Swift, Thomas T. Veblen, Amy V. Whipple, Thomas G. Whitham, Andreas P. Wion, Kai Zhu, Roman Zlotin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

64 Scopus citations

Abstract

Indirect climate effects on tree fecundity that come through variation in size and growth (climate-condition interactions) are not currently part of models used to predict future forests. Trends in species abundances predicted from meta-analyses and species distribution models will be misleading if they depend on the conditions of individuals. Here we find from a synthesis of tree species in North America that climate-condition interactions dominate responses through two pathways, i) effects of growth that depend on climate, and ii) effects of climate that depend on tree size. Because tree fecundity first increases and then declines with size, climate change that stimulates growth promotes a shift of small trees to more fecund sizes, but the opposite can be true for large sizes. Change the depresses growth also affects fecundity. We find a biogeographic divide, with these interactions reducing fecundity in the West and increasing it in the East. Continental-scale responses of these forests are thus driven largely by indirect effects, recommending management for climate change that considers multiple demographic rates.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1242
JournalNature Communications
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2021
Externally publishedYes

Funding

For access to sites and logistical support, we thank the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON). For comments on the manuscript, we thank Valentin Journe and Becky Tang. The project was funded for three decades by the National Science Foundation (most recently, DEB-1754443), and by the Belmont Forum (1854976), NASA (AIST16-0052, AIST18-0063), and the Programme d’Investisse-ment d’Avenir under project FORBIC (18-MPGA-0004). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.

FundersFunder number
National Science FoundationDEB-1754443, 1854976
National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationAIST16-0052, 18-MPGA-0004, AIST18-0063

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Continent-wide tree fecundity driven by indirect climate effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this