Content-based image retrieval as a computer aid for the detection of mammographic masses

Georgia D. Tourassi, Rene Vargas-Voracek, Carey E. Floyd

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to develop and evaluate a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) approach as a computer aid for the detection of masses in screening mammograms. The study was based on the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM). Initially, a knowledge database of 1,009 mammographic regions was created. They were all 512×512 pixel ROIs with known pathology. Specifically, there were 340 ROIs depicting a biopsy-proven malignant mass, 341 ROIs with a benign mass, and the remaining 328 ROIs were normal. Subsequently, the CBIR algorithm was implemented using mutual information (MI) as the similarity metric for image retrieval. The CBIR algorithm formed the basis of a knowledge-based CAD system. The system operated as follows. Given a databank of mammographic regions with known pathology, a query suspicious mammographic region was evaluated. Based on their information content, all similar cases in the databank were retrieved. The matches were rank-ordered and a decision index was calculated using the query's best matches. Based on a leave-one out sampling scheme, the CBIR-CAD system achieved an ROC area index AZ= 0.87±0.01 and a partial ROC area index 0.90AZ = 0.45±0.03 for the detection of masses in screening mammograms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)590-597
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Volume5032 I
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes
EventMedical Imaging 2003: Image Processing - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: Feb 17 2003Feb 20 2003

Keywords

  • Computer-assisted detection
  • Content-based image retrieval
  • Mammography
  • Mutual information

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Content-based image retrieval as a computer aid for the detection of mammographic masses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this