Consistency of O 16 (n,α) cross sections

M. T. Pigni, S. Croft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The evaluated O16(n,α) cross sections in the ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data library remain uncertain because of systematic discrepancies in the measured data. In the energy region below the first excited state, R-matrix analyses rely heavily on the inverse reaction, and in particular, they rely on the measured C13(α,n)O16 cross sections reported by Bair et al. in 1973 and Harissopulos et al. in 2005. The Harissopulos cross section values are systematically lower than those previously reported by Bair. Drawing on the available experimental information, this paper briefly describes and demonstrates that the two sets of measured cross sections are consistent.

Original languageEnglish
Article number014618
JournalPhysical Review C
Volume102
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2020

Funding

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) funded and managed by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) for DOE. ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 for the U.S. Department of Energy. The U.S. government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan .

FundersFunder number
Nuclear Criticality Safety Program
U.S. Department of Energy
National Nuclear Security Administration
Oak Ridge National LaboratoryDE-AC05-00OR22725

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Consistency of O 16 (n,α) cross sections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this