Abstract
The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide guide-posts to society as it attempts to respond to an array of pressing challenges. One of these challenges is energy; thus, the SDGs have become paramount for energy policy-making. Yet, while governments throughout the world have already declared the SDGs to be 'integrated and indivisible', there are still knowledge gaps surrounding how the interactions between the energy SDG targets and those of the non-energy-focused SDGs might play out in different contexts. In this review, we report on a large-scale assessment of the relevant energy literature, which we conducted to better our understanding of key energy-related interactions between SDGs, as well as their context-dependencies (relating to time, geography, governance, technology, and directionality). By (i) evaluating the nature and strength of the interactions identified, (ii) indicating the robustness of the evidence base, the agreement of that evidence, and our confidence in it, and (iii) highlighting critical areas where better understanding is needed or context dependencies should be considered, our review points to potential ways forward for both the policy making and scientific communities. First, we find that positive interactions between the SDGs outweigh the negative ones, both in number and magnitude. Second, of relevance for the scientific community, in order to fill knowledge gaps in critical areas, there is an urgent need for interdisciplinary research geared toward developing new data, scientific tools, and fresh perspectives. Third, of relevance for policy-making, wider efforts to promote policy coherence and integrated assessments are required to address potential policy spillovers across sectors, sustainability domains, and geographic and temporal boundaries. The task of conducting comprehensive science-to-policy assessments covering all SDGs, such as for the UN's Global Sustainable Development Report, remains manageable pending the availability of systematic reviews focusing on a limited number of SDG dimensions in each case.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 9326 |
Journal | Environmental Research Letters |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
The authors acknowledge funding provided by the CD-LINKS project of the European Commission (Horizon 2020, grant agreement No. 642147) and the IIASA-supported TWI2050 (The World in 2050) project. J.M. conducted the work for this article in the frame of the project 'Pathways and Entry Points to limit global warming to 1.5◦C' funded by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (Grant reference: 01LS1610B). Kirk Smith (UC-Berkeley), Shinichiro Fujimori (NIES and IIASA), Michaela Rossini (IIASA), and Anka James (IIASA) are also recognized for their assistance in the study. This paper was presented at the conference on Global Goals-new approaches to knowledge generation: challenges and solutions from local to global scales, which was sponsored by the OECD Co-operative Research Programme: Biological Resource Management for Sustainable Agricultural Systems and whose financial support made it possible for D.M. to participate in the conference. The opinions expressed and arguments employed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the OECD or of the governments of its Member countries. The authors acknowledge funding provided by the CD-LINKS project of the European Commission (Horizon 2020, grant agreement No. 642147) and the IIASA-supported TWI2050 (The World in 2050) project. J.M. conducted the work for this article in the frame of the project ‘Pathways and Entry Points to limit global warming to 1.5◦C’ funded by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (Grant reference: 01LS1610B). Kirk Smith (UC-Berkeley), Shinichiro Fujimori (NIES and IIASA), Michaela Rossini (IIASA), and Anka James (IIASA) are also recognized for their assistance in the study. This paper was presented at the conference on Global Goals—new approaches to knowledge generation: challenges and solutions from local to global scales, which was sponsored by the OECD Co-operative Research Programme: Biological Resource Management for Sustainable Agricultural Systems and whose financial support made it possible for D.M. to participate in the conference. The opinions expressed and arguments employed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the OECD or of the governments of its Member countries.
Keywords
- Energy
- Integrated assessment
- Sustainable development goals
- Systems analysis