Comprehensive framework for assessing and optimizing existing research networks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Conservation, monitoring, and research networks, or collections of ecological research sites unified under a common mission of data collection or a research mission, are essential infrastructure for understanding large landscapes. However, most networks developed opportunistically over decades rather than through systematic design, creating potential limitations in the ability to address conservation challenges across entire regions. We developed a framework to evaluate how well an existing research network represents the environmental conditions its members study and devised an approach to rank sites of priority for strategic expansion. Our approach measures performance through environmental representativeness, geographic coverage, and adequacy for scientific inference and thus optimizes limited monitoring resources to maximize scientific impact. We demonstrated this approach with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service Experimental Forests and Ranges Network (EFRN), a 79-site network across the United States that grew opportunistically over a century. At the national scale, the network effectively captured high-biomass forests important for carbon cycle research; 82% of forest biomass was in well-represented areas. Some areas in Texas, Florida, the Rocky Mountains, and the West Coast had no relevant EFRN sites, which limits the ability to make regional inferences. A fundamental challenge for the EFRN was that sites improving regional extent coverage sometimes provided minimal national benefits, which can create conflicts between local and global priorities. Adding the highest-ranked candidate site provided a relevant site for 17% of currently poorly represented 1-km pixel cells nationally, but regional and national site rankings varied considerably due to nested spatial inference. This framework provides quantitative tools for strategic infrastructure decision-making, ensures that limited monitoring resources maximize conservation impact, and can be applied broadly to address the widespread challenge of optimizing conservation and monitoring networks worldwide.

Original languageEnglish
JournalConservation Biology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2026

Funding

This work was supported by a competitive internal grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station, to W.W.H. and J.K. Helpful review suggestions were provided by S. Norman and M. Callaham. S. Laseter and J. Boggs provided assistance and administrative oversight. This manuscript has been authored in part by UT‐Battelle, LLC, under contract DE‐AC05‐00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The publisher acknowledges the U.S. government license to provide public access under the DOE Public Access Plan ( http://energy.gov/downloads/doe‐public‐access‐plan ). This work is not intended to make public policy recommendations. We did not evaluate the current value of the EFRN or any other network, and we are not suggesting that EFRN needs or should have any additional sites.

Keywords

  • additional site
  • Circunscripción
  • constituency
  • diseño de la muestra
  • escala
  • inference
  • inferencia
  • marco de referencia
  • reference frame
  • relevance
  • relevancia
  • representativeness
  • representatividad
  • sample design
  • scale
  • sitio adicional
  • 代表性
  • 参照框架
  • 尺度
  • 推断
  • 样本设计
  • 相关性
  • 组成成分
  • 补充站点

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comprehensive framework for assessing and optimizing existing research networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this