Abstract
We compare the core-collapse evolution of a pair of 15.8 M ☉ stars with significantly different internal structures, a consequence of the bimodal variability exhibited by massive stars during their late evolutionary stages. The 15.78 and 15.79 M ☉ progenitors have core masses (masses interior to an entropy of 4 k B baryon−1) of 1.47 and 1.78 M ☉ and compactness parameters ξ 1.75 of 0.302 and 0.604, respectively. The core-collapse simulations are carried out in 2D to nearly 3 s postbounce and show substantial differences in the times of shock revival and explosion energies. The 15.78 M ☉ model begins exploding promptly at 120 ms postbounce when a strong density decrement at the Si-Si/O shell interface, not present in the 15.79 M ☉ progenitor, encounters the stalled shock. The 15.79 M ☉ model takes 100 ms longer to explode but ultimately produces a more powerful explosion. Both the larger mass accretion rate and the more massive core of the 15.79 M ☉ model during the first 0.8 s postbounce time result in larger ν e/ ν ¯ e luminosities and RMS energies along with a flatter and higher-density heating region. The more-energetic explosion of the 15.79 M ☉ model resulted in the ejection of twice as much 56Ni. Most of the ejecta in both models are moderately proton rich, though counterintuitively the highest electron fraction (Y e = 0.61) ejecta in either model are in the less-energetic 15.78 M ☉ model, while the lowest electron fraction (Y e = 0.45) ejecta in either model are in the 15.79 M ☉ model.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 35 |
Journal | Astrophysical Journal |
Volume | 947 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 1 2023 |
Funding
This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Offices of Nuclear Physics and Advanced Scientific Computing Research, the NASA Astrophysics Theory Program (grant No. NNH11AQ72I), and the National Science Foundation PetaApps Program (grant Nos. OCI-0749242, OCI-0749204, and OCI-0749248), Nuclear Theory Program (Nos. PHY-1913531 and PHY-1516197) and Stellar Astronomy and Astrophysics program (No. AST-0653376). This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility located at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, operated under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is supported under contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 from the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy to UT-Battelle, LLC. This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Offices of Nuclear Physics and Advanced Scientific Computing Research, the NASA Astrophysics Theory Program (grant No. NNH11AQ72I), and the National Science Foundation PetaApps Program (grant Nos. OCI-0749242, OCI-0749204, and OCI-0749248), Nuclear Theory Program (Nos. PHY-1913531 and PHY-1516197) and Stellar Astronomy and Astrophysics program (No. AST-0653376). This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility located at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, operated under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is supported under contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 from the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy to UT-Battelle, LLC.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
National Science Foundation PetaApps Program | PHY-1913531, OCI-0749204, OCI-0749248, PHY-1516197, AST-0653376, OCI-0749242 |
Nuclear Physics and Advanced Scientific Computing Research | |
U.S. Department of Energy | |
National Aeronautics and Space Administration | NNH11AQ72I |
Office of Science | |
Oak Ridge National Laboratory | |
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-AC02-05CH11231 |