Comparison of long-term bioenergy with carbon capture and storage to reference power generation technologies using co2 avoidance cost in the U.S.

Abishek Kasturi, Sotira Yiacoumi, Matthew Langholtz, Joanna McFarlane, Ingrid Busch, Michael Hilliard, Costas Tsouris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) can sequester atmospheric CO2, while producing electricity. The CO2 avoidance cost (CAC) is used to calculate the marginal cost of avoided CO2 emissions for BECCS as compared to other established energy technologies. A comparative analysis using four different reference-case power plants for CAC calculations is performed here to evaluate the CO2 avoidance cost of BECCS implementation. Results from this work demonstrate that BECCS can generate electricity at costs competitive with other neutral emissions technologies, while simultaneously removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Approximately 73% of current coal power plants are approaching retirement by the year 2035 in the U.S. After considering CO2 sequestered from the atmosphere and coal power plant CO2 emissions displaced by BECCS, CO2 emissions can be reduced by 1.4 billion tonnes per year in the U.S. alone at a cost of $88 to $116 per tonne of CO2 removed from the atmosphere, for 10% to 90% of available biomass used, respectively. CAC calculations in this paper indicate that BECCS can help the U.S. and other countries transition to a decarbonized electricity grid, as simulations presented in this paper predict that BECCS power plants operate at lower CACs than coal plants with CCS.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7026
JournalEnergies
Volume14
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2021

Funding

Funding: This research was supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO), and by the DOE Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management under Contract Number DE-AC05-00OR22725.

FundersFunder number
DOE Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon ManagementDE-AC05-00OR22725
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Bioenergy Technologies Office

    Keywords

    • BECCS
    • Bioenergy
    • CCS
    • CO avoidance cost
    • Negative emissions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of long-term bioenergy with carbon capture and storage to reference power generation technologies using co2 avoidance cost in the U.S.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this