Comparison of characterization methods for differently atomized nickel-based alloy 625 powders

Amir Mostafaei, Colleen Hilla, Erica L. Stevens, Peeyush Nandwana, Amy M. Elliott, Markus Chmielus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

The deployment of additive manufacturing depends on the quality of the produced part, specifically the absence of internal defects, impurities and compositional gradient. In this study, differently atomized nickel-based alloy 625 powder particles were systematically characterized with different methods and results were compared. Powder properties were studied to understand the effect of different atomization methods on the properties of the powder particles. Morphology, shape and size of water and argon atomized powders were observed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed X-ray tomography (μCT); μCT with different resolution and sample setup. As expected, water atomized powder particles have irregular morphology in contrast to spherical gas atomized particles. Phase and elemental analysis were conducted with X-ray diffraction and energy dispersive spectroscopy; thermal properties were measured with differential scanning calorimetry. Gas atomized powder shows composition and melting temperature close to nominal bulk alloy 625. Particle size analysis was carried out using sieving, laser particle size analysis and μCT. It is found that the average particle size obtained from μCT depends on scan resolution. Additionally, porosity of the powders was observed in SEM micrographs and investigated in detail using μCT. In conclusion, μCT with higher resolution results in collecting accurate shape, size, porosity and morphology of the powder particles. Considering the large number of particles that can be investigated with μCT and ability to observe internal porosity, μCT is found to be an appropriate if not superior substitution for other powder characterization methods such as optical/electron microscopies, sieving and laser particle size analysis if time of characterization is not a concern.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180-192
Number of pages13
JournalPowder Technology
Volume333
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2018

Funding

This project was partially funded by the Air Force Research Laboratory under agreement number FA8650-12-2-7230 and by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Community and Economic Development, under Contract Number C000053981. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Advanced Manufacturing, under contract number DE-AC05-00OR22725. CH would like to thank the Swanson School of Engineering and the Office of the Provost of the University of Pittsburgh for their partial funding. We would like to Paul Prichard (Kennametal Inc.) for oxygen and carbon analysis, David Malehorn and Shannon Biery for Laser micro-track particle analysis, Chris Shafer for the laser powder size characterization, Katerina Kimes for optical image analysis on powders and Yashar Behnamian (University of Alberta, Canada) for differential scanning calorimetry measurements. We would also like to thank Microphotonics for providing the dental wax suggestion and materials. ELS acknowledges funding from the Department of Defense (DoD) through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate fellowship (NDSEG) program. This project was partially funded by the Air Force Research Laboratory under agreement number FA8650-12-2-7230 and by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania , acting through the Department of Community and Economic Development, under Contract Number C000053981 . This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Advanced Manufacturing , under contract number DE-AC05-00OR22725 . CH would like to thank the Swanson School of Engineering and the Office of the Provost of the University of Pittsburgh for their partial funding. We would like to Paul Prichard (Kennametal Inc.) for oxygen and carbon analysis, David Malehorn and Shannon Biery for Laser micro-track particle analysis, Chris Shafer for the laser powder size characterization, Katerina Kimes for optical image analysis on powders and Yashar Behnamian (University of Alberta, Canada) for differential scanning calorimetry measurements. We would also like to thank Microphotonics for providing the dental wax suggestion and materials. ELS acknowledges funding from the Department of Defense (DoD) through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate fellowship (NDSEG) program.

Keywords

  • Gas atomized powder
  • Inconel 625
  • Micro computed tomography
  • Morphology
  • Powder characterization
  • Water atomized powder

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of characterization methods for differently atomized nickel-based alloy 625 powders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this