Abstract
Recently, a new atmospheric general circulation model (GAMIL: Grid-point Atmospheric Model of IAP LASG) has been developed at the Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), which is based on the Community Atmospheric Model Version 2 (CAM2) of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). Since the two models have the same physical processes but different dynamical cores, the interannual variability simulation performances of the two models are compared. The ensemble approach is used to reduce model internal variability. In general, the simulation performances of the two models are similar. Both models have good performance in simulating total space-time variability and the Southern Oscillation Index. GAMIL performs better in the Eastern Asian winter circulation simulation than CAM2, and the model internal variability of GAMIL has a better response to external forcing than that of CAM2. These indicate that the improvement of the dynamic core is very important. It is also verified that there is less predictability in the middle and high latitudes than in the low latitudes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 82-88 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Advances in Atmospheric Sciences |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2007 |
Funding
Acknowledgements. This paper was supported by the Science Funds for Creative Research Groups (Grant No. 40221503) and the 973 Project (Grant No. 2005CB321703). All simulations were conducted on a Deepcomp 6800 computer at the Super Computing Center, Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Keywords
- CAM2
- Circulation
- Ensemble
- GAMIL
- Interannual variability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between GAMIL, and CAM2 on interannual variability simulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver