Comparison between an in-house vs. A commercial control system for beam line control

Martin Pieck; Kay Uwe Kasemir

Comparison between an in-house vs. A commercial control system for beam line control

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two independent magnet and vacuum control systems were implemented in the Low-Energy Demonstration Accelerator (LEDA) facility. The first one, for the High-Energy Beam Transport (HEBT) in context of the Accelerator Production of Tritium (APT) project, used the in-house Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System (EPICS). The second one, for the high-power proton beam-halo experiment (HALO-Channel) as an extension to the existing accelerator, is based on commercial products (National Instruments, LabVIEW). This paper will evaluate our experience during implementation, operation, and maintenance of these systems. It will include a discussion of various problems encountered and solutions implemented.

Original language	English
Pages	800-802
Number of pages	3
State	Published - 2001
Externally published	Yes
Event	2001 Particle Accelerator Conference - Chicago, IL, United States Duration: Jun 18 2001 → Jun 22 2001

Conference

Conference	2001 Particle Accelerator Conference
Country/Territory	United States
City	Chicago, IL
Period	06/18/01 → 06/22/01

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Cite this

@conference{f9b712887e6d412a87ec7713c6f511c1,

title = "Comparison between an in-house vs. A commercial control system for beam line control",

abstract = "Two independent magnet and vacuum control systems were implemented in the Low-Energy Demonstration Accelerator (LEDA) facility. The first one, for the High-Energy Beam Transport (HEBT) in context of the Accelerator Production of Tritium (APT) project, used the in-house Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System (EPICS). The second one, for the high-power proton beam-halo experiment (HALO-Channel) as an extension to the existing accelerator, is based on commercial products (National Instruments, LabVIEW). This paper will evaluate our experience during implementation, operation, and maintenance of these systems. It will include a discussion of various problems encountered and solutions implemented.",

author = "Martin Pieck and Kasemir, {Kay Uwe}",

year = "2001",

language = "English",

pages = "800--802",

note = "2001 Particle Accelerator Conference ; Conference date: 18-06-2001 Through 22-06-2001",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Comparison between an in-house vs. A commercial control system for beam line control

AU - Pieck, Martin

AU - Kasemir, Kay Uwe

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Two independent magnet and vacuum control systems were implemented in the Low-Energy Demonstration Accelerator (LEDA) facility. The first one, for the High-Energy Beam Transport (HEBT) in context of the Accelerator Production of Tritium (APT) project, used the in-house Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System (EPICS). The second one, for the high-power proton beam-halo experiment (HALO-Channel) as an extension to the existing accelerator, is based on commercial products (National Instruments, LabVIEW). This paper will evaluate our experience during implementation, operation, and maintenance of these systems. It will include a discussion of various problems encountered and solutions implemented.

AB - Two independent magnet and vacuum control systems were implemented in the Low-Energy Demonstration Accelerator (LEDA) facility. The first one, for the High-Energy Beam Transport (HEBT) in context of the Accelerator Production of Tritium (APT) project, used the in-house Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System (EPICS). The second one, for the high-power proton beam-halo experiment (HALO-Channel) as an extension to the existing accelerator, is based on commercial products (National Instruments, LabVIEW). This paper will evaluate our experience during implementation, operation, and maintenance of these systems. It will include a discussion of various problems encountered and solutions implemented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035571055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:0035571055

SP - 800

EP - 802

T2 - 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference

Y2 - 18 June 2001 through 22 June 2001

ER -

Comparison between an in-house vs. A commercial control system for beam line control

Abstract

Conference

UN SDGs

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this