Comparing methods for partitioning a decade of carbon dioxide and water vapor fluxes in a temperate forest

Benjamin N. Sulman, D. Tyler Roman, Todd M. Scanlon, Lixin Wang, Kimberly A. Novick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

64 Scopus citations

Abstract

The eddy covariance (EC) method is routinely used to measure net ecosystem fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO2) and evapotranspiration (ET) in terrestrial ecosystems. It is often desirable to partition CO2 flux into gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (RE), and to partition ET into evaporation and transpiration. We applied multiple partitioning methods, including the recently-developed flux variance similarity (FVS) partitioning method, to a ten-year record of ET and CO2 fluxes measured using EC at Morgan Monroe State Forest, a temperate, deciduous forest located in south-central Indiana, USA. While the FVS method has previously been demonstrated in croplands and grasslands, this is the first evaluation of the method in a forest. CO2 fluxes were partitioned using nonlinear regressions, FVS, and sub-canopy EC measurements. ET was partitioned using FVS and sub-canopy EC measurements, and sub-canopy potential evapotranspiration was calculated as an additional constraint on forest floor evaporation. Leaf gas exchange measurements were used to parameterize a model of water use efficiency (WUE) necessary for the FVS method. Scaled leaf gas exchange measurements also provided additional independent estimates of GPP and transpiration. There was good agreement among partitioning methods for transpiration and GPP, which also agreed well with scaled leaf gas exchange measurements. There was higher variability among methods for RE and evaporation. The sub-canopy flux method yielded lower estimates of evaporation and RE than FVS and lower estimates of RE than the nonlinear regression method, likely due to the exclusion of flux sources within the canopy but above the top of the sub-canopy tower for the sub-canopy flux method. Based on a sensitivity test, FVS flux partitioning was moderately sensitive to errors in WUE values, and underestimates of WUE significantly reduced the rate at which the algorithm was able to produce a physically valid solution. FVS partitioning has unique potential for retroactive ET partitioning at EC sites, because it relies on the same continuous measurements as EC and does not require additional specialized equipment. FVS also has advantages for partitioning CO2 fluxes, since it does not rely on the mechanistic assumptions necessary for the commonly used nonlinear regression technique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-245
Number of pages17
JournalAgricultural and Forest Meteorology
Volume226-227
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2016
Externally publishedYes

Funding

Special thanks to R.P. Phillips, E.R. Brzostek, S. Scott, D. Dragoni, H.P. Schmid, and S. Grimmond for contributions to the long data record at the site. This work was funded by the Indiana University Collaborative Research Grant Program and the Ameriflux Management Project (managed by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory with support from the US Department of Energy ). Additional computing support was provided by the Indiana University Geography Department . Thanks to the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

FundersFunder number
AmeriFlux Management Project
Indiana University Geography Department
US Department of Energy
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Indiana University

    Keywords

    • CO flux
    • Ecohydrology
    • Eddy covariance
    • Evapotranspiration
    • Flux partitioning
    • Water use efficiency

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing methods for partitioning a decade of carbon dioxide and water vapor fluxes in a temperate forest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this