TY - GEN
T1 - Combustion shaping using multivariable feedback control
AU - Maldonado, Bryan P.
AU - Lian, Huan
AU - Martz, Jason B.
AU - Stefanopoulou, Anna G.
AU - Zaseck, Kevin
AU - Kitagawa, Eiki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Automatic Control Council (AACC).
PY - 2017/6/29
Y1 - 2017/6/29
N2 - As high exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) is introduced for efficiency, the combustion duration and combustion delay is elongated due to slow fuel burn rates requiring flexible and robust management of both the combustion initiation and duration (what we call combustion shaping). Combustion shaping through cylinder pressure sensing and feedback control of spark advance (SA) and EGR-valve position can be used for spark ignited (SI) engines operating within highly dilute, high efficiency regimes even where the combustion variability (CV) limits controller bandwidth. Although EGR is directly related with combustion duration, spark advance affects the start and duration of combustion simultaneously. This input/output coupling suggests a multivariable controller that coordinates the actuators. Control of SA and EGR is investigated with a coupled linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) controller and compared with a decoupled proportional-integral (PI) controller. Simulation of the closed-loop system uses a simple engine model derived from system identification. Gain tuning was performed aiming for fast response without overshoot and considering cyclic variability reduction through a Kalman filter. Comparison of the simulated controllers shows that the LQG controller has better transients and responds better to CV.
AB - As high exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) is introduced for efficiency, the combustion duration and combustion delay is elongated due to slow fuel burn rates requiring flexible and robust management of both the combustion initiation and duration (what we call combustion shaping). Combustion shaping through cylinder pressure sensing and feedback control of spark advance (SA) and EGR-valve position can be used for spark ignited (SI) engines operating within highly dilute, high efficiency regimes even where the combustion variability (CV) limits controller bandwidth. Although EGR is directly related with combustion duration, spark advance affects the start and duration of combustion simultaneously. This input/output coupling suggests a multivariable controller that coordinates the actuators. Control of SA and EGR is investigated with a coupled linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) controller and compared with a decoupled proportional-integral (PI) controller. Simulation of the closed-loop system uses a simple engine model derived from system identification. Gain tuning was performed aiming for fast response without overshoot and considering cyclic variability reduction through a Kalman filter. Comparison of the simulated controllers shows that the LQG controller has better transients and responds better to CV.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027072028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.23919/ACC.2017.7963691
DO - 10.23919/ACC.2017.7963691
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85027072028
T3 - Proceedings of the American Control Conference
SP - 4760
EP - 4765
BT - 2017 American Control Conference, ACC 2017
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2017 American Control Conference, ACC 2017
Y2 - 24 May 2017 through 26 May 2017
ER -