Abstract
Studies have shown that fuel properties can impact an engine's operation in several ways, including ignition delay, sooting tendency, mixture formation, and combustion temperature. In mixing-controlled compression ignition (MCCI) engines, the fuel system design and piston bowl geometry significantly affect combustion performance and emissions. Based on current information, it is difficult to draw conclusions about fuel property effects and sensitivities. The central fuel hypothesis approach used in the US Department of Energy Co-Optima program has worked well for spark ignition fuels: identifying critical fuel property ranges is sufficient to screen fuel blends that are expected to maximize efficiency and reduce pollutant emissions. However, for MCCI-relevant fuels, the information gained from past studies is not sufficient to build such a merit function or to allow for performing a similar screening of fuel blends. It is hypothesized that a co-optimization of a fuel's physical and chemical properties, combustion system geometry, and injection strategy could leverage synergies between the effects of the fuel properties and geometries, resulting in improved performance over state-of-the-art. A machine learning–assisted unconstrained global optimization algorithm was used to explore a design space comprising 23 independent variables. The results show that physical property effects were minimal even for large variations in fuel properties, and the only interaction effect that was observed was the effect of varied fuel density parameters on fuel/air mixture formation. Nevertheless, these interactions were not sufficient in magnitude to significantly affect optimization results. Therefore, analysis of the results suggests that fuel physical properties cannot be leveraged in a co-optimization context to increase engine efficiency.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 134314 |
Journal | Fuel |
Volume | 387 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 1 2025 |
Funding
This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR2272 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the US DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, with special thanks to program manager Kevin Stork. This research used resources of the Compute Data Environment for Science (CADES) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under Contract no. DE-AC05-00OR22725. The authors would like to thank Convergent Science for providing licenses to Converge, which enabled this work. Authors would like to thank Russell Whitesides for development of fuel surrogates for this project. This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle LLC , under contract DE-AC05-00OR2272 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan ( http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan ). The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the US DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy , with special thanks to program manager Kevin Stork. This research used resources of the Compute Data Environment for Science (CADES) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under Contract no. DE-AC05-00OR22725 . The authors would like to thank Convergent Science for providing licenses to Converge, which enabled this work. Authors would like to thank Russell Whitesides for development of fuel surrogates for this project.
Keywords
- Co-optimization
- Combustion
- Fuel properties
- High efficiency
- Machine learning