Clustering in preferential attachment random graphs with edge-step

Caio Alves, Rodrigo Ribeiro, Rémy Sanchis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

We prove concentration inequality results for geometric graph properties of an instance of the Cooper-Frieze [5] preferential attachment model with edge-steps. More precisely, we investigate a random graph model that at each time, with probability p adds a new vertex to the graph (a vertex-step occurs) or with probability an edge connecting two existent vertices is added (an edge-step occurs). We prove concentration results for the global clustering coefficient as well as the clique number. More formally, we prove that the global clustering, with high probability, decays as for a positive function of p, whereas the clique number of these graphs is, up to subpolynomially small factors, of order.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)890-908
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Applied Probability
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 18 2021

Funding

We are grateful to Roberto Imbuzeiro Oliveira for the many inspiring conversations. C. A. was partially supported by FAPESP, grants 2013/24928-2 and 2015/18930-0, and by the DFG grant SA 3465/1-1. R. R. was partially supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científicoe Tecnológico (CNPq) and by the project Stochastic Models of Disordered and Complex Systems. The Stochastic Models of Disordered and Complex Systems is a Millennium Nucleus (NC120062) supported by the Millenium Scientific Initiative of the Ministry of Science and Technology (Chile). R. S. has been partially supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científicoe Tecnológico (CNPq) and by FAPEMIG (Programa Pesquisador Mineiro), grant PPM 00600/16.

Keywords

  • Complex networks
  • clique number
  • clustering coefficients
  • concentration bounds
  • transitivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clustering in preferential attachment random graphs with edge-step'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this