Climate risk management for the U.S. cellulosic biofuels supply chain

Matthew Langholtz, Erin Webb, Benjamin L. Preston, Anthony Turhollow, Norman Breuer, Laurence Eaton, Anthony W. King, Shahabaddine Sokhansanj, Sujithkumar Surendran Nair, Mark Downing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

As U.S. energy policy turns to bioenergy, and second-generation biofuels in particular, to foster energy security and environmental benefits, consideration should be given to the implications of climate risk for the incipient bioenergy industry. As a case-in-point, we review evidence from the 2012 U.S. drought, underscoring the risk of extreme weather events to the agricultural sector in general, and the bioenergy supply chain in particular, including reductions in feedstock production and higher prices for agricultural commodities and biofuels. We also use a risk management framework developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to review current understanding regarding climate-related hazards, exposure, and vulnerability of the bioenergy supply chain with a particular emphasis on the growing importance of lignocellulosic feedstocks to future bioenergy development. A number of climate-related hazards are projected to become more severe in future decades, and future growth of bioenergy feedstocks is likely to occur disproportionately in regions preferentially exposed to such hazards. However, strategies and opportunities are available across the supply chain to enhance coping and adaptive capacity in response to this risk. In particular, the implications of climate change will be influenced by the expansion of cellulosic feedstocks, particularly perennial grasses and woody biomass. In addition, advancements in feedstock development, logistics, and extension provide opportunities to support the sustainable development of a robust U.S. bioenergy industry as part of a holistic energy and environmental policy. However, given the nascent state of the cellulosic biofuels industry, careful attention should be given to managing climate risk over both short- and long-time scales.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-115
Number of pages20
JournalClimate Risk Management
Volume3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Funding

This project was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Bioenergy Technologies Office as well as by program development funds within Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s (ORNL) Environmental Sciences Division. ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Bioenergy
  • Climate change
  • Climate extremes
  • Risk management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Climate risk management for the U.S. cellulosic biofuels supply chain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this