Abstract
In this study, the cooling energy performance of two strategies for controlling ChWT (chilled water temperature) are compared: the conventional control strategy of constantly fixing ChWT and the OAT (outdoor air temperature) compensation control strategy that adjusts ChWT according to the changes in OAT. OAT compensation control strategy was modeled and realized based on Appendix G of ASHRAE Standard 90.1. It was confirmed that applying OAT compensation control strategy can significantly reduce chiller energy consumption, which accounts for the largest portion of total cooling energy consumption. It was found that the difference in total cooling energy consumption between applying the conventional control of constantly fixing ChWT to 6 °C and applying the OAT compensation control was approximately 8 % and 3 % during spring (March to May) and summer (June to August), respectively. Additionally, during the fall (September–November) period, about 7 % of total cooling energy consumption could be saved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1557-1568 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2022 |
Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2019R1A2C2087157). This work was also supported by a Korea University Grant (No. K2014481).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Korea University | K2014481 |
| National Research Foundation of Korea | |
| Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea | 2019R1A2C2087157 |
Keywords
- AHU (air handling unit)
- Chilled water temperature set-point
- Cooling energy
- Outdoor air temperature compensation control
- VAV (variable air volume)