Abstract
The antitumor effects of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (4-HPR), and its stable C-linked analog, 4-hydroxybenzylretinone (4-HBR) on the regression of established 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene(DMBA)-induced rat mammary tumors were compared. 4-HBR is a stable and nonhydrolyzable derivative which cannot be converted in vivo to retinoic acid (RA). The results indicate that 4-HBR decreased mammary tumor volumes to the same extent as equimolar concentration (2 mmol/kg diet) of 4-HPR (-45% for 4-HBR vs. -42% for 4-HPR, p<0.01). Both 4-HPR and 4-HBR bind very poorly to nuclear retinoid receptors RARs and RXRs. The similarity of physicochemical properties of 4-HPR and 4-HBR as well as their equal antitumor potency suggests that 4-HPR like 4-HBR, is acting directly rather than through hydrolysis to free RA. Treatment with 4-HPR caused an almost 65% decrease in serum retinol levels. These results suggest that 4-HBR may have a significant chemotherapeutic advantage over 4-HPR, as the nonhydrolyzable analog may not cause night blindness which occurs as a significant side effect of 4-HPR usage.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3839-3844 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Anticancer Research |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 6 A |
State | Published - 2001 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Breast cancer
- Cancer chemotherapy
- Fenretinide
- Mammary tumors
- Retinoids