Characterization of sulfonated Diels-Alder poly(phenylene) membranes for electrolyte separators in vanadium redox flow batteries

Zhijiang Tang, Jamie S. Lawton, Che Nan Sun, Jihua Chen, Michael I. Bright, Amanda M. Jones, Alex B. Papandrew, Cy H. Fujimoto, Thomas A. Zawodzinski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Sulfonated Diels-Alder poly(phenylene) (SDAPP) membranes were synthesized and characterized as potential electrolyte separators for vanadium redox flow batteries. The SDAPP membranes studied had ion exchange capacities of 1.4, 1.8 and 2.3 meq/g. Transmission electron microscopy imaging shows that the ionic domains in SDAPP are roughly 0.5 nm in dimension, while Nafion has a hydrophilic phase width of around 5 nm. The sulfuric acid uptake by SDAPP was higher than that for Nafion, but the materials had similar water uptake from solutions of various sulfuric acid concentrations. In equilibration with sulfuric acid concentrations ranging from 0-17.4 mol · kg-1, SDAPP with a IEC of 2.3 meq/g had the highest conductivity, ranging from 0.21 to 0.05 S · cm-1, while SDAPP with a IEC of 1.8 had conductivity close to Nafion 117, ranging from 0.11 to 0.02 S · cm-1. With varying sulfuric acid concentration and temperature, vanadium permeability in SDAPP is positively correlated to the membrane's IEC. The vanadium permeability of SDAPP 2.3 is similar to that of Nafion, but permeability values for SDAPP 1.8 and SDAPP 1.4 are substantially lower. The vanadium permeation decreases with increasing electrolyte sulfuric acid concentration. Vanadium diffusion activation energy is about 20 kJ · mol-1 in both SDAPP and Nafion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)A1860-A1868
JournalJournal of the Electrochemical Society
Volume161
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Characterization of sulfonated Diels-Alder poly(phenylene) membranes for electrolyte separators in vanadium redox flow batteries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this