Abstract
A CFD benchmark validation study for predicting breakdown voltage in capacitive switching test duties in high voltage circuit breaker is presented. The solver qualities of two different CFD tools based on qualitatively different numerical algorithms have been compared. The compared CFD algorithms are the pressure-correction based SIMPLEC scheme which is widely used in commercial tools and the density based Jameson's method with explicit time marching. We then investigate on how the different compressible flow solver quality influences on the prediction capability of the breakdown voltages in capacitive switching test duties, for actual high voltage circuit breakers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 4570365 |
Pages (from-to) | 428-431 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Conference Record of IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2008 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation, ISEI 2008 - Vancouver, BC, Canada Duration: Jun 9 2008 → Jun 12 2008 |