Abstract
The use of fuel reformate from catalytic processes is known to have beneficial effects on the spark-ignited combustion process through enhanced dilution tolerance and decreased combustion duration, but, in many cases, reformate generation can incur a significant fuel penalty. In this two-part investigation, we demonstrate that efficient catalytic fuel reforming can result in improved brake engine efficiency while maintaining stoichiometric exhaust under the right conditions. In Part 1 of this investigation, we used a combination of thermodynamic equilibrium calculations and experimental fuel catalytic reforming measurements on an engine to characterize the best possible reforming performance and energetics over a range of equivalence ratios and O2 concentrations. Ideally, one might expect the highest levels of thermochemical recuperation for the highest catalyst equivalence ratios. However, reforming under these conditions is highly endothermic, and the available enthalpy for reforming is constrained. Thus, for relatively high equivalence ratios, more methane and less H2 and CO are produced. Our experiments revealed that this suppression of H2 and CO could be countered by adding small amounts of O2, yielding as much as 15 vol % H2 at the catalyst outlet for 4 < φcatalyst < 7 under quasi-steady-state conditions. Under these conditions, the H2 and CO yields were highest and there was significant water consumption, confirming the presence of steam reforming reactions. Analyses of the experimental catalyst measurements indicated the possibility of both endothermic and exothermic reaction stages and global reaction rates sufficient to enable the utilization of higher space velocities than those employed in our experiments. In a companion paper detailing Part 2 of this investigation, we present results for the engine dilution tolerance and brake engine efficiency impacts of the reforming levels achieved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2245-2256 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Energy and Fuels |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 15 2018 |
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Office, particularly program managers Gurpreet Singh and Mike Weismiller. The authors also gratefully acknowledge John Nunan (Umicore) for providing catalyst samples and Galen Fisher (University of Michigan) for supporting our efforts to obtain substrates and catalysts. Yan Chang was also enrolled as a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Michigan at the time of this publication. *E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID James P. Szybist: 0000-0002-3550-4423 Josh A. Pihl: 0000-0002-9798-4012 Author Contributions ‡The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript. These authors contributed equally. Notes This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under Contract No. DE-AC0500OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The U.S. government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/ doe-public-access-plan). The authors declare no competing financial interest. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Office, particularly program managers Gurpreet Singh and Mike Weismiller. The authors also gratefully acknowledge John Nunan (Umicore) for providing catalyst samples and Galen Fisher (University of Michigan) for supporting our efforts to obtain substrates and catalysts. Yan Chang was also enrolled as a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Michigan at the time of this publication; she would like to express her gratitude for the strong support she received from her coadvisors, Prof. Andre Boehman and Dr. Stani Bohac.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Office | |
UT-Battelle | |
U.S. Department of Energy | |
University of Michigan |