Abstract
Croplands are highly productive ecosystems that contribute to land–atmosphere exchange of carbon, energy, and water during their short growing seasons. We evaluated and compared net ecosystem exchange (NEE), latent heat flux (LE), and sensible heat flux (H) simulated by a suite of ecosystem models at five agricultural eddy covariance flux tower sites in the central United States as part of the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis project. Most of the models overestimated H and underestimated LE during the growing season, leading to overall higher Bowen ratios compared to the observations. Most models systematically under predicted NEE, especially at rain-fed sites. Certain crop-specific models that were developed considering the high productivity and associated physiological changes in specific crops better predicted the NEE and LE at both rain-fed and irrigated sites. Models with specific parameterization for different crops better simulated the inter-annual variability of NEE for maize-soybean rotation compared to those models with a single generic crop type. Stratification according to basic model formulation and phenological methodology did not explain significant variation in model performance across these sites and crops. The under prediction of NEE and LE and over prediction of H by most of the models suggests that models developed and parameterized for natural ecosystems cannot accurately predict the more robust physiology of highly bred and intensively managed crop ecosystems. When coupled in Earth System Models, it is likely that the excessive physiological stress simulated in many land surface component models leads to overestimation of temperature and atmospheric boundary layer depth, and underestimation of humidity and CO2 seasonal uptake over agricultural regions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 53-76 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Biogeochemistry |
Volume | 129 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 1 2016 |
Funding
We would like to thank the North American Carbon Program Site-Level Interim Synthesis team, the Modeling and Synthesis Thematic Data Center, and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center for collecting, organizing, and distributing the model output and flux observations required for this analysis. We acknowledge the comments given by Dr. Andrew Richardson during the initial stages of this manuscript. This research was partly funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE; under contract Nos DE-FG02-06ER64317 and DE-AC02-05CH11231) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award NA07OAR4310115. Data from the US-ARM site was supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the U.S. Department of Energy (under grant or contract DE-AC02-05CH11231) as part of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program. We also acknowledge the support from the Center for Multiscale Modeling of Atmospheric Processes (CMMAP; NSF-ATM-0425247). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Keywords
- Carbon and energy fluxes
- Cropland carbon and energy exchange
- Cropland ecosystems
- Land–atmosphere exchange
- Model-data comparison