Can simple machine learning tools extend and improve temperature-based methods to infer streambed flux?

  • Mohammad A. Moghaddam
  • , Ty P.A. Ferré
  • , Xingyuan Chen
  • , Kewei Chen
  • , Xuehang Song
  • , Glenn Hammond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Temperature-based methods have been developed to infer 1D vertical exchange flux between a stream and the subsurface. Current analyses rely on fitting physically based analytical and numerical models to temperature time series measured at multiple depths to infer daily average flux. These methods have seen wide use in hydrologic science despite strong simplifying assumptions including a lack of consideration of model structural error or the impacts of multidimensional flow or the impacts of transient streambed hydraulic properties. We performed a “perfect-model experiment” investigation to examine whether regression trees, with and without gradient boosting, can extract sufficient information from model-generated subsurface temperature time series, with and without added measurement error, to infer the corresponding exchange flux time series at the streambed surface. Using model-generated, synthetic data allowed us to assess the basic limitations to the use of machine learning; further examination of real data is only warranted if the method can be shown to perform well under these ideal conditions. We also examined whether the inherent feature importance analyses of tree-based machine learning methods can be used to optimize monitoring networks for exchange flux inference.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2837
JournalWater (Switzerland)
Volume13
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2021
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (Washington, DC, USA), Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER), as part of BER’s Subsurface Biogeochemical Research Program (SBR). This contribution originates from the SBR Scientific Focus Area (SFA) at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) (Washington, DC, USA). PNNL is operated for the DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (Albuquerque, NM, USA), a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. This article describes objective technical results and analysis. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Energy or the United States Government. Funding: This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (Washington, DC, USA), Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER), as part of BER’s Subsurface Biogeochemical Research Program (SBR). This contribution originates from the SBR Scientific Focus Area (SFA) at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) (Washington, DC, USA). PNNL is operated for the DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (Albuquerque, NM, USA), a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. This article describes objective technical results and analysis. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Energy or the United States Government.

Keywords

  • Groundwater monitoring
  • Groundwater recharge
  • Groundwater-surface water interactions
  • Integrated hydrologic models
  • Machine learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can simple machine learning tools extend and improve temperature-based methods to infer streambed flux?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this