Building-Level Comparison of Microsoft and Google Open Building Footprints Datasets

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Large-scale datasets of building footprints are a crucial source of information for a variety of efforts. In 2023, the general public benefits from open access to multiple sources of building footprints at the country scale or larger, such as those produced by Microsoft and Google. However, none of the available datasets have attained complete global coverage, and researchers and analysts may need to combine multiple sources to assemble a complete set of building footprints for their area of interest or choose between overlapping sources, requiring an understanding of the differences between different building sources. This paper presents a method to closely examine the quality of different building footprint sources by matching corresponding buildings across datasets, using building footprints in Ethiopia published by Microsoft and Google as an example set.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication12th International Conference on Geographic Information Science, GIScience 2023
EditorsRoger Beecham, Jed A. Long, Dianna Smith, Qunshan Zhao, Sarah Wise
PublisherSchloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
ISBN (Electronic)9783959772884
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023
Event12th International Conference on Geographic Information Science, GIScience 2023 - Leeds, United Kingdom
Duration: Sep 12 2023Sep 15 2023

Publication series

NameLeibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
Volume277
ISSN (Print)1868-8969

Conference

Conference12th International Conference on Geographic Information Science, GIScience 2023
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityLeeds
Period09/12/2309/15/23

Funding

© Notice: This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/ doe-public-access-plan). This material is based upon the work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC05-00OR22725. The author gives thanks to Daniel Adams and Jessica Moehl for their thoughtful review and advice. © Notice: This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/ doe-public-access-plan). This material is based upon the work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC05-00OR22725.

FundersFunder number
DOE Public Access Plan
U.S. Department of Energy

    Keywords

    • Building footprints
    • Data comparison
    • Open data

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Building-Level Comparison of Microsoft and Google Open Building Footprints Datasets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this