Biotesting of wastewater: A comparative study using the Salmonella and CHO assay systems

Means to assess the toxicity of wastewaters are essential to implementing the Federal Clean Water Act. Health risk assessment based on single chemicals is limited by the number of chemicals that can be identified and to those chemicals for which toxicity data are available. Long‐term whole animal tests on large numbers of waste‐water samples are not practical. In this study, two short‐term tests, the Salmonella mutagenicity assay and the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell assay for mutagenicity and cytotoxicity, were evaluated as potentially useful biomonitors of wastewaters. Standard assay protocols were modified to allow testing of up to 2.5 and 3.4 ml of unconcentrated water in the bacterial and mammalian cell tests, respectively. Cytotoxicity and mutagenicity were detected in some unconcentrated wastewater samples using these modifications. Data on eight wastewater samples, representing five different sites, indicated that the Salmonella test is the more sensitive indicator of mutagenic activity in those samples, whereas the CHO test is a sensitive indicator of the presence of cytotoxic components. Wastewater concentrates, prepared by adsorption onto XAD‐2 and “blue cotton,” were compared in the two bioas‐says. In a single concentrate, the two short‐term tests detected distinctly different mutagens. Advantages of using the CHO‐AS52 cell line instead of the CHO‐K₁BH₄ line for detecting wastewater mutagens were indicated. This study illustrates the complementary use of multiple bioassays and concentration methods to detect and characterize toxic components in wastewater.