Biological lignocellulose solubilization: Comparative evaluation of biocatalysts and enhancement via cotreatment

Julie M.D. Paye, Anna Guseva, Sarah K. Hammer, Erica Gjersing, Mark F. Davis, Brian H. Davison, Jessica Olstad, Bryon S. Donohoe, Thanh Yen Nguyen, Charles E. Wyman, Sivakumar Pattathil, Michael G. Hahn, Lee R. Lynd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

82 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Feedstock recalcitrance is the most important barrier impeding cost-effective production of cellulosic biofuels. Pioneer commercial cellulosic ethanol facilities employ thermochemical pretreatment and addition of fungal cellulase, reflecting the main research emphasis in the field. However, it has been suggested that it may be possible to process cellulosic biomass without thermochemical pretreatment using thermophilic, cellulolytic bacteria. To further explore this idea, we examine the ability of various biocatalysts to solubilize autoclaved but otherwise unpretreated cellulosic biomass under controlled but not industrial conditions. Results: Carbohydrate solubilization of mid-season harvested switchgrass after 5 days ranged from 24 % for Caldicellulosiruptor bescii to 65 % for Clostridium thermocellum, with intermediate values for a thermophilic horse manure enrichment, Clostridium clariflavum, Clostridium cellulolyticum, and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) featuring a fungal cellulase cocktail and yeast. Under a variety of conditions, solubilization yields were about twice as high for C. thermocellum compared to fungal cellulase. Solubilization of mid-season harvested switchgrass was about twice that of senescent switchgrass. Lower yields and greater dependence on particle size were observed for Populus as compared to switchgrass. Trends observed from data drawn from six conversion systems and three substrates, including both time course and end-point data, were (1) equal fractional solubilization of glucan and xylan, (2) no biological solubilization of the non-carbohydrate fraction of biomass, and (3) higher solubilization for three of the four bacterial cultures tested as compared to the fungal cellulase system. Brief (5 min) ball milling of solids remaining after fermentation of senescent switchgrass by C. thermocellum nearly doubled carbohydrate solubilization upon reinnoculation as compared to a control without milling. Greater particle size reduction and solubilization were observed for milling of partially fermented solids than for unfermented solids. Physical disruption of cellulosic feedstocks after initiation of fermentation, termed cotreatment, warrants further study. Conclusions: While the ability to achieve significant solubilization of minimally pretreated switchgrass is widespread, a fivefold difference between the most and least effective biocatalyst - feedstock combinations was observed. Starting with nature's best biomass-solubilizing systems may enable a reduction in the amount of non-biological processing required, and in particular substitution of cotreatment for pretreatment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8
JournalBiotechnology for Biofuels
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 12 2016

Funding

This research was sponsored by BioEnergy Science Center (BESC). The BioEn-ergy Science Center is a US Department of Energy Bioenergy Research Center supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science. TYN was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant #2013142496). The generation of the CCRC series of plant cell wall glycan-directed monoclonal antibodies used here was supported by the National Science Foundation Plant Genome Program (DBI-0421683 and IOS-0923992). Additional support was provided by Mascoma Corp. and the Link Foundation. The authors thank Dr. Marvin Hall, Dr. Thomas Richard and Kay DiMarco at Pennsylvania State University and Dr. Neal Stewart of University of Tennessee for providing switchgrass, Dr. Michael Adams at University of Georgia for providing C. bescii, and Novozymes for providing Ctec2 and Htec2.

FundersFunder number
BioEnergy Science Center
Mascoma Corp.
National Science Foundation Plant Genome ProgramIOS-0923992, DBI-0421683
National Science Foundation2013142496
U.S. Department of Energy
Directorate for Biological Sciences0421683, 0923992
Link Foundation
Office of Science
Biological and Environmental Research

    Keywords

    • Biological solubilization
    • Cotreatment
    • Lignocellulose

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Biological lignocellulose solubilization: Comparative evaluation of biocatalysts and enhancement via cotreatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this