TY - GEN
T1 - Bias Correction in Urban Building Energy Modeling for Chicago Using Machine Learning
AU - Chowdhury, Shovan
AU - Li, Fengqi
AU - Stubbings, Avery
AU - New, Joshua
AU - Garg, Ankur
AU - Correa, Santiago
AU - Bacabac, Kevin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 IEEE.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Urban-scale building energy modeling (UBEM) holds promise for optimizing energy usage across extensive geographic regions. However, there is a recognized bias between simulated energy consumption and actual measured data. This study, based on building data from Chicago, delved into bias correction techniques for enhancing the accuracy of UBEM energy consumption estimates. Initially, the AutoBEM simulation yielded a normalized mean bias error (NMBE) of 1.1% and 51% of Coefficient of the Variation of the Root Mean Square Error (CVRMSE) after outlier exclusion. To address this, three bias correction methods were deployed: Average Mean Bias Error based bias correction, Quantile mapping bias correction, and Machine learning-based bias correction using Linear Regression and Random Forest models. Post-correction results exhibited marked improvement. The NMBE values were diminished to 0 for Average MBE-based, 0.36 for Quantile Mapping, and 0 for Machine Learning-based corrections. Concurrently, the CVRMSE values registered reductions from an original 51 to 50.8 for Quantile Mapping, and 38.56 for Machine Learning-based corrections, pointing towards the effectiveness of specific bias correction methods in refining the precision of UBEM energy predictions. Such accurate estimations are paramount for informed energy planning and urban policy-making.
AB - Urban-scale building energy modeling (UBEM) holds promise for optimizing energy usage across extensive geographic regions. However, there is a recognized bias between simulated energy consumption and actual measured data. This study, based on building data from Chicago, delved into bias correction techniques for enhancing the accuracy of UBEM energy consumption estimates. Initially, the AutoBEM simulation yielded a normalized mean bias error (NMBE) of 1.1% and 51% of Coefficient of the Variation of the Root Mean Square Error (CVRMSE) after outlier exclusion. To address this, three bias correction methods were deployed: Average Mean Bias Error based bias correction, Quantile mapping bias correction, and Machine learning-based bias correction using Linear Regression and Random Forest models. Post-correction results exhibited marked improvement. The NMBE values were diminished to 0 for Average MBE-based, 0.36 for Quantile Mapping, and 0 for Machine Learning-based corrections. Concurrently, the CVRMSE values registered reductions from an original 51 to 50.8 for Quantile Mapping, and 38.56 for Machine Learning-based corrections, pointing towards the effectiveness of specific bias correction methods in refining the precision of UBEM energy predictions. Such accurate estimations are paramount for informed energy planning and urban policy-making.
KW - Bias Correction
KW - Machine Learning
KW - Quantile Mapping
KW - Random Forest
KW - Urban-scale building energy modeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179764802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/IDSTA58916.2023.10317837
DO - 10.1109/IDSTA58916.2023.10317837
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85179764802
T3 - 2023 International Conference on Intelligent Data Science Technologies and Applications, IDSTA 2023
SP - 91
EP - 98
BT - 2023 International Conference on Intelligent Data Science Technologies and Applications, IDSTA 2023
A2 - Alsmirat, Mohammad
A2 - Jararweh, Yaser
A2 - Aloqaily, Moayad
A2 - Lloret, Jaime
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Data Science Technologies and Applications, IDSTA 2023
Y2 - 24 October 2023 through 26 October 2023
ER -