Abstract
Reduced activation ferritic (RAF) martensitic steels are promising candidates for the first wall of fusion reactors. However, current manufacturing capabilities call for these components to be made by welding wrought plates. This limits design freedom and necessitates the use of post-weld heat treatments (PWHT) in accordance with the boiler and pressure vessel code. Additive manufacturing (AM) can offer a unique solution to solve this challenge by leveraging the layer-wise deposition strategy to come up with temper bead deposition techniques to eliminate post-pro-cessing heat treatments (PPHT). However, it is necessary to benchmark the properties of RAF steels fabricated by AM with their wrought counterparts to identify the process-structure-property corre-lation, which is the goal of this study. The study demonstrates that while tensile properties at room temperature and high temperatures are satisfactory, the as fabricated and samples after PPHT have significant heterogeneity in tensile elongation. This has been attributed to the presence of disconti-nuities in the build. The as-fabricated samples have an average tensile strength of 1190 + 12 MPa and an average elongation of 15 + 5% at room temperature and 658 ± 20 MPa ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and 14 ± 7% at 600 °C. After the post-weld heat treatment, mechanical properties decrease to around 600–650 MPa and an elongation between 20–25% at room temperature to 300 MPa UTS and 25–28% elongation at 600 °C. The characterization of microstructures at various length scales demonstrates that the as-fabricated structure has a significant fraction of delta ferrite in a lath martensitic matrix. No precipitates could be identified in the as-fabricated structure. PPHT led to a decrease in the area fraction of delta ferrite and precipitation of M23C6 and MX. Detailed characterization clearly demonstrates that the lack of precipitates in the as-fabricated structure could be due to the slow tempering response of the alloy. Finally, the needs to develop new alloys to achieve the objectives stated above are articulated.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 342 |
Journal | Metals |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2022 |
Funding
Funding: This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department Funding: of Energy (DOE). The publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan, accessed on 26 December 2021). This research was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences. This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department Funding: of Energy (DOE). The publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, ir-revocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or al-low others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://en-ergy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan, accessed on 26 December 2021). This research was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences. Acknowledgments: The authors gratefully acknowledge the numerous discussions with Kevin G. Field and the valuable insights offered by Arunodaya Bhattacharya. The help of Ying Yang is also acknowledged for creating the simulated phase diagrams. We want to acknowledge John Echols for editing and proofreading the document. The authors would also like to acknowledge Tom Geer and Eric T. Manneschmidt for the metallography and generating the tensile test data. We gratefully acknowledge the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Fusion Energy Sciences program for funding this work. The FEI (now Thermo Fisher Scientific) Talos F200X instrument used in this work was provided by the Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Fuel Cycle R&D Program and the Nuclear Science User Facilities.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
DOE Public Access Plan | |
U.S. Department of Energy | |
Office of Science | |
Fusion Energy Sciences |
Keywords
- Additive manufacturing
- Fusion energy
- Heat-treatment
- Microstructure analysis
- Reduced activation ferritic mar-tensitic steel