Abstract
The finite state projection (FSP) approach to solving the chemical master equation has enabled successful inference of discrete stochastic models to predict single-cell gene regulation dynamics. Unfortunately, the FSP approach is highly computationally intensive for all but the simplest models, an issue that is highly problematic when parameter inference and uncertainty quantification takes enormous numbers of parameter evaluations. To address this issue, we propose two new computational methods for the Bayesian inference of stochastic gene expression parameters given single-cell experiments. We formulate and verify an adaptive delayed acceptance Metropolis-Hastings (ADAMH) algorithm to utilize with reduced Krylov-basis projections of the FSP. We then introduce an extension of the ADAMH into a hybrid scheme that consists of an initial phase to construct a reduced model and a faster second phase to sample from the approximate posterior distribution determined by the constructed model. We test and compare both algorithms to an adaptive Metropolis algorithm with full FSP-based likelihood evaluations on three example models and simulated data to show that the new ADAMH variants achieve substantial speedup in comparison to the full FSP approach. By reducing the computational costs of parameter estimation, we expect the ADAMH approach to enable efficient data-driven estimation for more complex gene regulation models.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2217-2234 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of Physical Chemistry B |
Volume | 123 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 14 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R25GM105608 and R35GM124747. The work reported here was partially supported by a National Science Foundation grant (DGE-1450032). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommen- dations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
National Science Foundation | DGE-1450032 |
National Institutes of Health | |
National Institute of General Medical Sciences | R25GM105608, R35GM124747 |