Abstract
Silicon carbide fiber reinforced, silicon carbide matrix composites (SiC-SiC) offer strength at high temperatures, corrosion resistance, and stability during irradiation, and are being developed by General Atomics as cladding for accident tolerant fuel (ATF) applications and advanced reactor concepts. Advanced joining techniques capable of withstanding harsh reactor environments are key to enable GA's SiGAtm SiC-SiC composite. The objective of this work is to obtain joint-specific material properties for assemblies in representative planar and cladding geometries that will allow for the generation of a material properties database and more accurate simulation of SiC joint behavior across a range of temperatures and irradiation conditions. To support this, three different joint formulations are being assessed for mechanical and thermal performance pre and post irradiation in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HIFR) at ORNL. GA has previously identified its hybrid SiC (HSiC) joint as the most promising and best suited joining approach for cladding applications [1]. Additionally, oxide and trans-eutectic phase (TEP) joints are being investigated to make the material property database more comprehensive as these joints have previously shown strength resilience under irradiation in planar geometries [2]. The thermal and mechanical data obtained in this work will address vital knowledge gaps, enabling more accurate modeling of joints in SiC-based components for accelerated material qualification. The scope of work presented here focuses on the mechanical and thermal performance of the joint material prior to irradiation in HFIR. Endplug push-out (EPPO) testing to determine joint strength in tube geometries, and shear strength testing for planar geometries have provided a benchmark for pre-irradiation mechanical performance. These results show that all three selected joint methodologies result in cladding joints capable of withstanding the expected joint stresses in a LWR reactor environment [3]. This has been accompanied by He leak testing of the joint regions on tube specimens to assess the suitability of each joint methodology for cladding applications. Here, only the HSiC formulation consistently met critical leak rate requirements suggesting that other joining strategies require additional development. Finally, pre-irradiation thermal testing has been completed to establish a baseline for comparison after irradiation. Subsequent irradiation of these joints types in HFIR will provide further detail on joint material properties and their appropriateness for nuclear applications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages | 675-683 |
Number of pages | 9 |
State | Published - 2020 |
Event | 14th International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Conference, GLOBAL 2019 and Light Water Reactor Fuel Performance Conference, TOP FUEL 2019 - Seattle, United States Duration: Sep 22 2019 → Sep 27 2019 |
Conference
Conference | 14th International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Conference, GLOBAL 2019 and Light Water Reactor Fuel Performance Conference, TOP FUEL 2019 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Seattle |
Period | 09/22/19 → 09/27/19 |
Funding
Funding provided by the DOE-NE NSUF program under contract DE-NE0008720. Furthermore, the authors are thankful to Dan Long and Joel Kosmatka for their support in sample fabrication and testing, and Kirill Shapovalov for his insight into He leak testing. Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof nor any of their employees make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.