TY - GEN
T1 - Assessment of large eddy simulation predictive capability for compound angle round film holes
AU - Rodebaugh, Gregory
AU - Stratton, Zachary
AU - Benson, Michael
AU - Laskowski, Gregory
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 by ASME.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Film cooling holes with a compound angle are commonly used on high pressure turbine components in lieu of axial holes to improve effectiveness or as a result of manufacturing constraints. Whereas large eddy simulation (LES) of axial holes is becoming more common place, assessment of LES predictive ability for compound angle hole has been limited. For this study, the selected compound angle round (CAR) hole configuration has a 30 degree injection angle, a 45 degree compound angle, and a density ratio of 1.5. The geometry, flow conditions, and experimental adiabatic effectiveness validation data are f rom McClintic et al. [28]. The low f ree stream Mach number of the experiment puts the flow in the incompressible regime. Two LES solvers are evaluated, Fluent and FDL3Di, on structured meshes with a range of blowing ratios simulated for plenum, inline coolant crossflow, and counter coolant crossflow feed holes. When a steady inlet profile is used for the main flow, LES agreement with the data is poor. The inclusion of a resolved turbulent boundary layer significantly improves the predictive quality for both solvers; consequently, resolved inflow turbulence is a required aspect for CAR hole LES. The remaining differences between the simulations and IR data are partly attributed to the steady coolant inlet profiles used for the counter and inline cross feeds.
AB - Film cooling holes with a compound angle are commonly used on high pressure turbine components in lieu of axial holes to improve effectiveness or as a result of manufacturing constraints. Whereas large eddy simulation (LES) of axial holes is becoming more common place, assessment of LES predictive ability for compound angle hole has been limited. For this study, the selected compound angle round (CAR) hole configuration has a 30 degree injection angle, a 45 degree compound angle, and a density ratio of 1.5. The geometry, flow conditions, and experimental adiabatic effectiveness validation data are f rom McClintic et al. [28]. The low f ree stream Mach number of the experiment puts the flow in the incompressible regime. Two LES solvers are evaluated, Fluent and FDL3Di, on structured meshes with a range of blowing ratios simulated for plenum, inline coolant crossflow, and counter coolant crossflow feed holes. When a steady inlet profile is used for the main flow, LES agreement with the data is poor. The inclusion of a resolved turbulent boundary layer significantly improves the predictive quality for both solvers; consequently, resolved inflow turbulence is a required aspect for CAR hole LES. The remaining differences between the simulations and IR data are partly attributed to the steady coolant inlet profiles used for the counter and inline cross feeds.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954350054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/GT2015-43602
DO - 10.1115/GT2015-43602
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84954350054
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
BT - Heat Transfer
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2015
Y2 - 15 June 2015 through 19 June 2015
ER -