Artefactual responses of mesophyll conductance to CO2 and irradiance estimated with the variable J and online isotope discrimination methods

Lianhong Gu, Ying Sun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

105 Scopus citations

Abstract

Studies with the variable J method have reported that mesophyll conductance (gm) rapidly decreases with increasing intercellular CO2 partial pressures (Ci) or decreasing irradiance. Similar responses have been suggested with the online isotope discrimination method, although with less consistency. Here we show that even when the true gm is constant, the variable J method can produce an artefactual dependence of gm on Ci or irradiance similar to those reported in previous studies for any of the following factors: day respiration and chloroplastic CO2 photocompensation point are estimated with Laisk method; Ci or electron transport rate is positively biased; net photosynthetic rate is negatively biased; insufficient NADPH is assumed while insufficient ATP limits RuBP regeneration. The isotopic method produces similar artefacts if fractionation of carboxylation or Ci is positively biased or Δ13 negatively biased. A non-zero chloroplastic resistance to CO2 movement results in a qualitatively different dependence of gm on Ci or irradiance and this dependence is only sensitive at low Ci. We thus cannot rule out the possibility that previously reported dependence of gm on Ci or irradiance is a methodological artefact. Recommendations are made to take advantage of sensitivities of the variable J and isotopic methods for estimating gm.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1231-1249
Number of pages19
JournalPlant Cell and Environment
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • Carbon isotope discrimination
  • Chlorophyll fluorescence
  • Mesophyll diffusion
  • Photosynthesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Artefactual responses of mesophyll conductance to CO2 and irradiance estimated with the variable J and online isotope discrimination methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this